Great test innings are rooted in memory for myriad and special reasons. There are umpteen factors that determine whether an innings can truly be termed great. Some of these include match context, quality of opposition, nature of the pitch and conditions, extraneous factors such as the scenario leading into the match and well most of all the quality of the innings itself. Innumerable performances have graced the world stage over the years but it makes a little more sense to try and enlist those starting 1970 as the years before were considerably different when it came to the cricket played and the approach in general..This exercise despite offering a great deal of pleasure and evoking a sense of nostalgia can also bring about heavy criticism for not considering certain performances and also regarding one better than the other. It should be understood that the task in itself is extremely arduous and while there is a specific reason for one knock being regarded better than another, the ratings do not in any way seek to belittle a particular player or performance.
10. At number ten in the list is Ricky Ponting's magnificent 156 against England at Old Trafford in 2005. The series went into the crucial third test tied at 1-1 and it was imperative to avoid defeat. With Glenn McGrath just back from injury and Jason Gillespie woefully out of form, the Australians were staring down the barrel. England exploited the conditions perfectly and when the Aussies were left to chase over 400 with more than a day to go, it looked like there would be only one result possible. Ponting had other ideas though. Batsmen came and went as he watched. Yet, in a remarkable display of concentration and focus, he produced an obdurate innings punctuated with glorious strokeplay on both sides of the wicket. He stood alone defying England for almost the entire of the final day. He departed with four overs to go gloving a ball on the leg side and disappointment was writ large on his face. The gritty Brett Lee and McGrath hung on stubbornly for a draw to make sure their captain's innings didn't go in waste. It certainly ranks among the finest innings ever played by a skipper in test cricket.
The scorecard of this game can be found here.
9. Mike Atherton did not quite drag people to the ground to watch him bat, but his defiance and dogged determination in face of adversity against top class fast bowling can never be forgotten. He did produce many such knocks but none better than the marathon 185* in over twelve hours against the great fast bowling pair of Allan Donald and Shaun Pollock in 1995 at Johannesburg. With stubborn resistance by Jack Russell at the other end, Atherton erected a monumental effort that must without doubt go down as one of the greatest rearguard knocks in history. Two years later he defied a barrage of short pitched bowling by Allan Donald to lead England to victory but the knock at the Wanderers was the special one.
The scorecard of this game can be found here.
8. England vs West Indies had ceased to be a contest right from 1976 when Michael Holding terrorized the English batsmen. Viv Richards had piled on the runs and England had been crushed 3-0. They had not won a single game till 1984 and when the series moved to the second test at Lords with West Indies leading 1-0, few gave England a chance. David Gower's team mustered 286 and with Ian Botham bowling brilliantly to pick up eight wickets, England surprisingly held a 41 run lead. They batted positively and reached 300/9 when their captain had the temerity to declare leaving West Indies with an extremely difficult 342 to get in about 72 overs. Little did they know what would hit them. Gordon Greenidge, who was dismissed for just 1 in the first innings was nursing an injured leg. He went on and smashed a quite superb 214* off 242 balls striking 29 fours and 2 sixes in the process. The only wicket the hapless English bowlers managed to get was that of Desmond Haynes through a run out. West Indies made light work of the huge target by knocking the runs off in just 66 overs and the audacious knock had stunned all of England. The bowlers including the first innings hero Ian Botham had been treated with disdain and this innings of Greenidge which set up the first 'blackwash' of England must surely go down as one of the finest and most aggressive in a chase.
The scorecard of this test at Lords is here.
7. India were hosting Pakistan in 1999 after a long gap of twelve years. In the first test at the M.A Chidambaram stadium in Chennai, the venue of many a great contest, India bowled extremely well to keep the Pakistani batting lineup to just 238. Pakistan's excellent bowling attack though stunned India and the hosts just managed a very slender lead of 16 runs. The match was all set to be a cracker. Shahid Afridi, one of the many young talents from Pakistan scored a brilliant 141 and when Pakistan were comfortably placed at 275/4, it looked like it was curtains for India. In a display of panic and self destruction typically associated with Pakistan, they collapsed to be all all out for 286 leaving India with a competitive target of 271 to get. The Pakistani bowlers reduced India to 82/5 and India was staring down the barrel at this stage. Sachin Tendulkar who had been dismissed third ball for a duck in the first innings was joined by the wicketkeeper Nayan Mongia. Tendulkar despite suffering from a back strain produced a superlative innings single handedly taking India closer to victory. Mongia fell with fifty three required and when Tendulkar played his first false shot with the score on 254, there was just 17 runs to get with three wickets in hand. He had made a brilliant 136 and come up trumps against one of the finest bowling attacks in world cricket. Despite his gutsy effort, the Indian tail was bowled out in a trice to leave the Pakistan team victorious by 12 runs. Tendulkar was inconsolable and his quite sublime knock was in vain as were many others before that. But there is little doubt that this display by the little master ranks right up there in the pantheon of centuries scored over the years.
The scorecard of this classic encounter is here.
6. West Indies toured India in 1974 and the first test played at Bangalore marked the debut of two of its greatest batsmen in Vivian Richards and Gordon Greenidge. The Caribbeans had jumped to a 2-0 lead after thrashing India in the first two tests. In the absence of Sunil Gavaskar, India fought back by winning the next test at the Eden Gardens in Calcutta with Gundappa Viswanath scoring a hundred. In the vital fourth test played at Madras, India were rocked by a fierce spell of fast bowling by Andy Roberts. Amidst all the ruins, Viswanath made a superb unbeaten 97. On a genuinely quick track against top class fast bowling, this innings by Vishy oozes quality and the context places it among the finest knocks played by an Indian in test cricket.
The scorecard can be found here.
5. Sunil Gavaskar had long been the rock of the Indian batting lineup. Ever since his extraordinary debut series in 1971, he had amassed centuries against the finest attacks and in his final series at home in 1987, he was up against Imran Khan's Pakistan team. The final test of an otherwise dull series moved to Bangalore and on a minefield of a track, Pakistan were bundled out for 116. Maninder Singh picked up 7/27. India did not far much better either earning a slender lead of 29. The pitch was turning square and Pakistan put up a much better display in the second innings and set India a target of 221 which was going to be extremely difficult considering the nature of the pitch. In a quite stunning display of impeccable technique and remarkable concentration, Gavaskar who was playing his final test tackled the spinners with ease and is seemed like the great man was batting on a different surface. Ultimately when he was dismissed for 96, spectators who had witnessed the knock knew that India would miss a special batsman. India lost the game by a close margin of 17 runs but all the talk was about Sunil Gavaskar's champion knock.
The scorecard can be found here.
4. In over 16 years England had not won a single test let alone a series against the mighty West Indies. They had been humiliated home and away and when they finally won a test in 1990, they unluckily lost the series 2-1. The 1991 series in England was viewed as yet another hopeless mismatch. The powerful fast bowling attack of the West Indies included the legendary Malcolm Marshall, the dangerous Patrick Patterson, Curtly Ambrose and Courtney Walsh. On a seaming track in Headingley in overcast conditions, England were bowled out for 198 but responded in fine style to dismiss the West Indies for 173 with Viv Richards scoring 73. In the second innings though, England were tottering against the pace attack when Graham Gooch orchestrated a remarkable fightback by scoring 154* out of a total of 252. He defied some of most aggressive bowling in extremely difficult conditions and set up a total which England went on to defend successfully. Considering the quality of the attack, the conditions and the history of past contests, this brilliant knock by Graham Gooch is rated right up the scale.
The scorecard from this Headingley game is here.
3. The 1981 Ashes saw an inauspicious start for England when they were defeated in the first test. Things only got worse when their captain Ian Botham resigned after bagging a pair in the second test at Lords. Mike Brearley took over in the third test at Headingley under extreme pressure. When England were asked to follow on after being bowled out for 174 in response to Australia's 401, the situation was very grim indeed. Ian Botham who made a quickfire half century in the first innings was soon in after Dennis Lillee and Terry Alderman wrecked England in the second innings too. At 135/7, with Graham Dilley joining Botham, there seemed to be no hope. Dilley initially started aggressively and this spurred Botham on and from then on,n what can only be described as out of the world, Ian Botham proceeded to flay the Aussie bowlers to all parts. His exceptional 149 n.o and his partnerships with Dilley and Old left Australia with a modest target of 130 to get. He picked up the first wicket and his efforts till that point had provided tremendous confidence to the bowlers especially Bob Willis who bowled remarkably to capture 8/43 and bowl Australia out for 111. England had won from a situation of no hope and this was only the beginning as they went onto win the Ashes with more scintillating displays from Ian Botham. Not for nothing is this known as 'Botham's Ashes' and not without reason is this innings one of the greatest of all time.
The scorecard of this great test match is here.
2. Steve Waugh's juggernaut arrived in India in 2001 for a three test series. Australia surprisingly had not triumphed in India in over 30 years and this led Waugh to label it as the 'last frontier'. They set about the task in a most amazing manner when they thrashed India in the first test at Mumbai by 10 wickets. In the second test at the Eden Gardens in Calcutta, in response to Australia's huge total of 445, India were bundled out cheaply for just 171 and when the follow on was enforced, defeat and humiliation loomed large. India were reduced to 115/3 when Tendulkar was dismissed. The captain Saurav Ganguly joined VVS Laxman who had been the sole bright spark in the first innings. They put on a century stand before Ganguly fell to the great Glenn McGrath for 48. Rahul Dravid, who had been out of form leading into this innings joined Laxman and what followed for the next day and a bit is history. The pair put on a mammoth 376 run stand and Laxman's strokeplay was sublime. In a chanceless display of batting worth going miles to see, he essayed some gorgeous shots off the fast bowlers and his inside out cover drive off Shane Warne taking the ball from outside leg stump stands out in memory. When he finally fell for an immortal 281, he had put India well on the way to victory and with Harbhajan Singh in supreme bowling form, India levelled the series and then went onto clinch a thriller in Chennai to dent Steve Waugh's hopes of conquering the final frontier. The match situation and the exceptional attack he was facing coupled with the sheer quality of the batting dwarfs most other knocks played in test history.
The scorecard of this magnificent test match can be found here.
1. West Indies hosted Steve Waugh's powerful Australian side in 1999. The West Indies team had been in state of decline for a long time and following the debacle in South Africa and innumerable contract and board problems, Brian Lara's position as captain was under grave threat leading into the series. The first test at Lara's hometown Port of Spain further added to the team's woes when they were bowled out for a paltry 51 and lost by a heavy margin of 312 runs. People called for Lara's head and if ever there was a performance needed to salvage personal and team pride, this was the moment. Lara responded as only champions can by scoring 213 in the next test at Jamaica and fine bowling helped level the series at 1-1. In the third test at Barbados, Australia despite being bowled out cheaply in the second innings had set the home side a very difficult target of 308. At 105/5, there seemed no way back. An incensed Lara, who had been angered by some comments from Glenn McGrath went on to play some brilliant shots caning the Australian bowlers. Jimmy Adams provided some valuable support but when McGrath removed Adams and then grabbed two more wickets, the West Indies were down in the dumps at 248/8. With 60 to get and only Ambrose and the rather inept Walsh to come, it seemed done and dusted. Ambrose fortuitously survived some fine fast bowling and kept Lara company. Lara meanwhile compiled a glorious hundred and when Ambrose attempted one dab too many and edged to Elliott at gully, the target was six away. Courtney Walsh strode to the middle and what followed was comical, thrilling and edge of the seat stuff as he managed to somehow keep out some brilliant deliveries which might have even taken out a top batsman. Lara was given a reprieve when Ian Healy put him down off Gillespie. He then proceeded to smash Gillespie through the covers to seal an improbable win. Barbados erupted in joy and delirious scenes were witnessed all over. The spectacular comeback from the depths of the first test can never be forgotten and Brian Lara's performance in the series where he scored 213, 153* and 100 to help the West Indies draw the contest after being trounced in the first test will undoubtedly rank as the finest innings played in adversity both on and off the field. The sheer class of Lara as he produced such a brilliant knock enduring some tremendous pressure ranks it the best of all.
The scorecard can be found here.
Perhaps the greatest innings played in modern times has to be the 254 by Garry Sobers at the MCG against Australia while playing for the World XI in 1971-72. Sadly this series was not accorded official status but nevertheless the quality of players on the field that day makes one understand the significance and brilliance of the knock. Dennis Lillee had been bowling superbly all through the series and had dismissed Sobers for a duck in the first innings. The Aussies gained a lead of 101 runs and when Sobers came into bat in the second innings, the world XI were in a difficult situation. He destroyed Lillee's bowling and his shots often rebounded back onto the playing field after hitting the hoardings. His glorious 254 stunned the Australians and led Don Bradman to remark that it was the finest display of batting he had ever seen down under. What made this knock by Sobers all the more amazing was that it was at the fag end of his career. Unofficial though the test was, this innings by the one and only Sobers has often been regarded by many players as the finest ever.
The scorecard can be found here.
While compiling this list, I encountered many difficulties. There have been so many classic performances and it is extremely hard to pick let alone provide a rating. Some other memorable ones that might figure in other top tens include Gavaskar's 221 at the Oval, Dean Jones 210 at Madras, Richards' century at Delhi in 1987-88, Steve Waugh's gutsy 200 at Jamaica in 1995, Sachin Tendulkar's 169 at Cape Town in 1996 and 155 at Madras, Adam Gilchrist's 149 at Hobart in 1999, Brian Lara's solo efforts against Sri Lanka in 2000-01, Dravid's masterpiece in 2002 at Leeds and many many more..
Summarizing the list
1. Brian Lara -153* vs Australia
2. VVS Laxman-281 vs Australia
3. Ian Botham- 149* vs Australia
4. Graham Gooch- 154* against WI
5. Sunil Gavaskar- 96 against Pakistan
6. Gundappa Viswanath-97 against WI
7. Sachin Tendulkar-136 against Pakistan
8. Gordon Greenidge-214* against England
9. Mike Atherton- 185* against SA
10.Ricky Ponting-156 against England
and the best of all Garry Sobers -254 for world XI against Australia.
Do provide your comments and mention the other knocks that I might have missed out during this attempt to rate the greatest innings played...
Monday, March 29, 2010
Sunday, March 28, 2010
Live in vs Marriage...
Yesterday was one of those rare days when I switched channels to catch something totally not sport related. I was watching a debate show I catch once a while-NDTV's 'We the people'. The topic made me sit up and listen as it has been one I have argued on and discussed about many a time of late. There is little doubt that this generation in India has embraced most of the ideas of the west and adherence to Indian culture and tradition has taken a back seat..The concept of a LIVE IN relationship has become the most controversial and debated in Indian society..Arranged marriages were most common in urban India but over the years marriage after a period of courtship, more commonly referred to as love marriage has also become extremely popular and acceptable..
Indian society has almost throughout been a perfect example of hypocrisy..It has had its flaws but tries to portray that it doesn't. The Westernization of thought started a couple of decades back and though this may not necessarily be a bad idea in most circumstances, it is definitely proving to be harmful when it comes to certain very stable aspects of our society. At the outset, I would like to clarify that I belong to the old school of thought. Morality, marriage, a stable family and ethics matter a lot to me and this is almost surely reflected in my arguments. But nevertheless, I do also understand and accept that I do need to look at the other side of the coin..
People involved in the debate were diverse..Some were in live-in relationships, some happily married, some youngsters who were not sure if marriage was necessary and some who ultimately married after being in a live in. Their perspectives were extremely interesting to say the least even if finally inconclusive..My personal take on this front is that a live in relationship more often than not is an option many highly career oriented couples choose to take..The very fact that the exit door is far more accessible in this case than in case of a marriage where one has a great deal of responsibility towards his/her spouse, the family and society also in general..In Indian society especially, divorce is still taboo despite increased divorce rates. Live in relationships provide couples with all the benefits that marriage does provide. They can enjoy emotional and physical bonding without allowing it to get in the way of their careers. Often, in many marriages, it is seen that balancing the personal and professional life becomes too big a challenge. This is more so when kids come into the picture..
Marriages on the other hand, more so in India are solemnized by a sacred oath which in most cases is a binding factor..Fights and arguments in relationships are sorted out considering the long term benefits and advantages of a stable family..Societal norms play a huge role as well in traditional Indian families when it comes to decisions in marriages..Indians find it rather difficult to accept that premarital sex is rife and that live in relationships have become quite common..Ultimately, be it live in relationships or stable marriages, what matters the most is the commitment towards the partner..Personally, I believe that seeking a live in relationship to avoid the trials that might pop up post marriage and also trying to find an easy exit in times of difficulty is sheer escapism...Innumerable examples can be given when couples have braved the odds, struggled through difficult times and brought up their children in a congenial atmosphere paving the way for their success..
Indian culture has always been respected for some of the strong values that it inculcates and it is rather unfortunate that at a time when people all over the world including the West respect the Indian approach to marriage i.e. striving for a stable relationship, most Indians especially the present generation tend to disregard the importance of the same..The sense of security and confidence that a stable marriage brings especially for the kids when they grow up should never be underestimated..
Though there is no definitive conclusion that can be sought to this debate, it is imperative to know that one must respect the choice of an individual in this case. A live in relationship might be beneficial for sometime to get to know the partner and helps iron out differences while laying out a good platform for a successful long term relationship. Misusing this form of relationship so as to derive physical pleasure while being aware that one can always exit without a second thought is wrong..I definitely hope that couples realize that marriage is not just a social obligation. It is as much a source of strength for a family as it is for society in general. The importance of unwavering commitment in any relationship is unquestionable and if marriage is the better way to strengthen the same, then it is the way to go..
Indian society has almost throughout been a perfect example of hypocrisy..It has had its flaws but tries to portray that it doesn't. The Westernization of thought started a couple of decades back and though this may not necessarily be a bad idea in most circumstances, it is definitely proving to be harmful when it comes to certain very stable aspects of our society. At the outset, I would like to clarify that I belong to the old school of thought. Morality, marriage, a stable family and ethics matter a lot to me and this is almost surely reflected in my arguments. But nevertheless, I do also understand and accept that I do need to look at the other side of the coin..
People involved in the debate were diverse..Some were in live-in relationships, some happily married, some youngsters who were not sure if marriage was necessary and some who ultimately married after being in a live in. Their perspectives were extremely interesting to say the least even if finally inconclusive..My personal take on this front is that a live in relationship more often than not is an option many highly career oriented couples choose to take..The very fact that the exit door is far more accessible in this case than in case of a marriage where one has a great deal of responsibility towards his/her spouse, the family and society also in general..In Indian society especially, divorce is still taboo despite increased divorce rates. Live in relationships provide couples with all the benefits that marriage does provide. They can enjoy emotional and physical bonding without allowing it to get in the way of their careers. Often, in many marriages, it is seen that balancing the personal and professional life becomes too big a challenge. This is more so when kids come into the picture..
Marriages on the other hand, more so in India are solemnized by a sacred oath which in most cases is a binding factor..Fights and arguments in relationships are sorted out considering the long term benefits and advantages of a stable family..Societal norms play a huge role as well in traditional Indian families when it comes to decisions in marriages..Indians find it rather difficult to accept that premarital sex is rife and that live in relationships have become quite common..Ultimately, be it live in relationships or stable marriages, what matters the most is the commitment towards the partner..Personally, I believe that seeking a live in relationship to avoid the trials that might pop up post marriage and also trying to find an easy exit in times of difficulty is sheer escapism...Innumerable examples can be given when couples have braved the odds, struggled through difficult times and brought up their children in a congenial atmosphere paving the way for their success..
Indian culture has always been respected for some of the strong values that it inculcates and it is rather unfortunate that at a time when people all over the world including the West respect the Indian approach to marriage i.e. striving for a stable relationship, most Indians especially the present generation tend to disregard the importance of the same..The sense of security and confidence that a stable marriage brings especially for the kids when they grow up should never be underestimated..
Though there is no definitive conclusion that can be sought to this debate, it is imperative to know that one must respect the choice of an individual in this case. A live in relationship might be beneficial for sometime to get to know the partner and helps iron out differences while laying out a good platform for a successful long term relationship. Misusing this form of relationship so as to derive physical pleasure while being aware that one can always exit without a second thought is wrong..I definitely hope that couples realize that marriage is not just a social obligation. It is as much a source of strength for a family as it is for society in general. The importance of unwavering commitment in any relationship is unquestionable and if marriage is the better way to strengthen the same, then it is the way to go..
Thursday, March 25, 2010
Cant wait for KICKOFF!
It can be stated with certainty that no sporting event on this planet can hope to match the aura and charm of the Football World Cup. Millions of fans in over a hundred nations wait with bated breath for the great tournament to begin..The sense of anticipation and tension is palpable..All this with good reason!..The world cup over the years has witnessed extraordinary crowds, brilliant players and great teams..The variety in style and footballing approach is unmissable..The open free flowing Brazilian style is in sharp contrast to the much more text book style of England and Germany. Holland's ability to enthrall and also disappoint in equal measure sets them apart. Argentina's fantastic footballing skills and of late the supreme athleticism of the the African nations has virtually guaranteed some high octane entertainment..
Top performances from players and teams over the years stand out in memory. Right from the supremely confident Ferenc Puskas who led Hungary in 1954, the precocious talent of Pele who appeared on the world stage in 1958, the unbelievably skilled Garrincha who played throughout with deformed feet, England's fairytale win in 1966 with the help of Geoff Hurst and Bobby Charlton not to mention Eusebio's remarkable football all through the tournament, Pele and Jairzinho gracing the 1970 edition, Holland, led by the classy Johann Cruyff, charming one and all in 1974 and 1978 yet finishing agonizingly short, the resilience of Germany in 1974 and the brilliance of Argentina in 1978..Dino Zoff's Italian champion side of 1982 which won despite the presence of the great Brazilian pairing of Zico and Socrates. 1986 was all about Diego Maradona. His extraordinary repertoire of skills proved too much for most teams and his goal against England remains embedded in memory...West Germany prevailed in 1990 and 1994 just means Roberto Baggio's penalty miss..Brazil played a truly superb tournament in 1998 courtesy their superstar Ronaldo but a mysterious illness kept him out of the finals and they were easily beaten by France with the genius Zinedine Zidane scoring twice..The Brazilians combined superbly and coached by the eccentric Scolari, they took the trophy for the fifth time. In the last edition i.e. 2006, Italy prevailed over France in a tense shootout which was made famous for all the wrong reasons with Zidane head-butting Materazzi and getting sent off at a crucial juncture..
As a tribute to this fascinating trophy, I felt I should just revisit the previous tournaments and take a walk over the years highlighting the major moments which for sure will stay registered in the memory of a football lover..
The first trophy was played in 1930 in Uruguay and the host prevailed in the finals..Italy won the 1934 and 1938 editions and the number of teams in the tournament was slowly increasing...The world war prevented the staging of the tournament in 1942 and 1946..In 1950, the World Cup was staged in Brazil..In front of a packed Maracana stadium rumoured to have accommodated close to two hundred thousand people, the hosts and favourites Brazil lost to Uruguay 1-2...This was deemed the final though it was actually one of the round robin games played..
The 1954 World cup was staged in Switzerland and Hungary were led by Ferenc Puskas, nicknamed the Galloping Major'. They trounced one and all and thrashed the eventual finalists West Germany 8-3 in a round robin game..But German resilience came to the fore in the final and they prevailed over Hungary 3-2... The 1958 finals in Sweden was dominated by the Samba boys from Brazil..Pele, who went on to become the finest footballer of all time made his debut at the age of 17..Just Fontaine of France scored a record 13 goals in the tournament which is still a record..Brazil defeated Sweden 5-2 to take their first title..The 1962 tournament was all about the wondrously gifted Garrincha, known as the 'little bird'..Born with deformed feet after a polio attack, his runs on the right flank became legendary..He conjured up some sublime performances all through the World cup and Brazil won the title by beating Czechoslovakia 3-1..
Photos below: left- the legendary Ferenc Puskas and right- the dazzling Garrincha
One of the most popular editions of the great tournament was the 1966 one..It was held in England and people all over hoped that England would win its first trophy..There were superb matches none better than the game where minnows North Korea took a stunning lead of 3-0 against giants Portugal only to lose 5-3. Portugal's Eusebio was the standout performer..England and West Germany progressed to the finals played at the legendary Wembley stadium and at the end of normal time the teams were tied 2-2...A highly controversial goal was awarded to England in extra time when most believed that the ball had not crossed the line..The referee in a moment of indecision and madness awarded a goal and this decision is debated till today..Geoff Hurst added another goal and eventually ended up scoring a hat trick to help the captain Bobby Moore and the great coach Alf Ramsey lead the England team to its maiden triumph..
Photo: below- England win the World cup 1966
The 1970 world cup was held in Mexico and some of the more memorable moments included the stunning save that Gordon Banks produced to prevent a certain goal off a header by the great Pele..Brazil cruised to another triumph by thrashing Italy 4-1 in the finals and Pele was the toast of the footballing world..The 1974 edition was held in West Germany..Holland, known as the 'brilliant oranges' stunned the world with a superb display of attacking football..Their attractive style was due to their captain, the classy Johann Cruyff..Neeskens scored in the final against Germany even before the opponents had touched the ball..but the gritty Germans somehow clawed their way back and won 2-1..The Dutch supporters were devastated but the superb football endured in memory..The 1978 finals again saw Holland stumble at the final hurdle, this time against Argentina..It is universally accepted that the Dutch teams that ended up as the runner up in 1974 and 1978 were the best never to win the trophy..
Photos: left- Pele and Bobby Moore after Brazil beat England in 1970
right- the 'ballet dancer'- Johann Cruyff of Holland
Dino Zoff, at the age of forty, along with the great Paolo Rossi,led Italy to their third trophy in 1982 in Spain..Brazil had two legends in Zico and Socrates and were very much favoured to win the world cup..Italy though upstaged them in the semis and defeated West Germany to take the trophy after a long gap of 44 years (the last they won was in 1938)...
The 1986 world cup in Mexico was all about Diego Maradona, the diminutive Argentinian who enthralled one and all with his superb runs, exceptional control and brilliant judgment..The quarter finals saw Maradona rip apart England with some glorious football..Two goals in that game will never be forgotten as long as the game exists...The notorious 'Hand of God' goal when in the spur of the moment, Maradona punched the ball from near his head into the goal..It was blatant..Much to the chagrin of the Englishmen, their appeals went unheard and the goal stayed..The legend though erased this from memory by scoring what is regarded the finest goal ever...He took a couple of turns in his half and beat a host of English defenders before finally racing past the bemused Peter Shilton to slot home the goal of the century..Argentina went on to claim the trophy by defeating the Germans in the final at the Aztec stadium..The 'Mexican wave' gained popularity ever since this tournament..The 1990 tournament was held in Italy and the Germans won by defeating Argentina in a controversial and ill tempered final..'Toto' Schillaci of Italy scored the most goals..The biggest upset was when Cameroon beat Argentina with goals from the talented Roger Milla..
photo below: Maradona lifting the trophy, Mexico 1986
The 1994 tournament was held in the USA and record attendances were witnessed for most games..England failed to qualify for this edition and Brazil was on song throughout..Romario and Bebeto combined brilliantly..the trademark celebration of the Brazilians was the rocking of a cradle started by Bebeto to signify the birth of his child...Dunga lifted the trophy for Brazil after a dull final which was decided on penalties..Italy's great striker Roberto Baggio missed his shot and was in tears after that...The tragic killing of Andres Escobar, the Colombian who scored an own goal left a bad taste at the end of the tournament..
The 1998 edition in France saw both Brazil and France dominate throughout..David Beckham's sending off against Argentina after kicking out at David Simeone remains a highlight along with Michael Owen's remarkable first goal..The Dutch were unlucky to lose to Brazil in the semis while France edged the Croats..Croatia's Davor Suker scored the most goals in the tournament.. Ronaldo had been superb all through the tournament but just prior to the final collapsed and with this episode went Brazil's confidence..Zinedine Zidane scored twice off corners to make it 2-0 for France and then Emmanuel Petit scored a third to make it a comprehensive win for the French..
photos below: left- Romario and Bebeto- cradle celebration 1994
right- Zinedine Zidane in 1998
The 2002 edition was held in Japan and South Korea..State of the art grounds including the Sapporo dome and Yokohama provided a visual treat and the football was also high quality..Senegal upset holders France to create a huge shock..Turkey played superb football but finally lost to Brazil in the semis..In the quarter final, England opened the scoring through Michael Owen but then soon enough, they were buried by the dazzling skills of Ronalidinho..His super run and pass to Rivaldo set up the equalizer and the next goal was a stunning free kick when from over 35 yards he lifted the ball over the dumbstruck David Seaman.. Ronaldo and Rivaldo were in supreme touch and they combined wonderfully in the finals against Germany...In the semis against South Korea who earlier had created a huge shock when they downed Italy and Spain, Michael Ballack, Germany's talismanic striker had scored but was then forced to commit a professional foul to deny a Korean goal..He was sent off which meant he would miss the all important finals..The Germans tried their best to keep the Brazilians at bay especially through the efforts of their brilliant custodian Oliver Kahn...But Kahn's first fumble cost them a goal when Ronaldo pounced on the rebound and a superb dummy by Rivaldo led to the second goal which enabled Brazil to clinch the trophy for the fifth time...
photo below: Ronaldo in 2002
The 2006 edition in Germany was ordinary for most parts and the finals was contested between Italy who had mastered the art of defensive football..France had Zinedine Zidane and they knew he was the sole hope..The final was evenly contested until Zidane in a moment of madness charged and head butted Materazzi of Italy..The latter had been riling the legendary Zidane and the reaction though expected wasn't appropriate considering the occasion..Zidane was sent off and Italy won the final on penalties..The triumph was overshadowed by this unfortunate episode..
photo below: Zidane runs into Materazzi in the finals in 2006
The 2010 edition promises to be bigger than ever with the African nations aiming to provide a grandstand finish..Top class young stars such as Wayne Rooney of England, Lionel Messi of Argentina and Cristiano Ronaldo of Portugal will brighten up the tournament..Brazil and Argentina look good though it must be said Argentina were lucky to qualify..England look a rejuvenated side under Fabio Capello and would seek to end their drought..Holland and Spain are in excellent form and boast the service of some truly world class players..Spain have been tipped the favourite by many to lift the trophy..The Spanish along with the Dutch and English, remain one of the perennial underachievers in football...I am looking forward to a truly classic tournament and cant wait for kickoff..My guess/hope is that the semis will have Holland, England, Brazil, Argentina/Spain...After that its anybody's game!..I just cant wait for June 11th...
photos below: left - Lionel Messi
centre- Wayne Rooney
right- Cristiano Ronaldo
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Master vs Genius!!
To most cricket lovers, Sachin Tendulkar and Brian Lara have been the finest and most exciting batsmen of this era and possibly of all time. There have been numerous arguments and discussions as to who has been more successful, the more exciting, more consistent and eventually the biggest question of all--- who is better?... while it may be almost impossible to come to a conclusion that everyone will accept, I being a huge fan of both and an even bigger stats buff decided to undertake a venture that would yield fairly useful results. I would once again like to reiterate that these views and the way the stats have been interpreted may differ from person to person and no way am I trying to enforce any point or opinion here. It is a purely statistical sojourn coupled with some cricketing acumen. So please do go ahead- read, interpret and provide your valuable comments as to what other points can be considered.
PS: I would really not want to see any comments accusing me of bias and the like. This has been a work where I have had to put in quite a bit of effort and partiality and bias are not factors in this at all.
All stats here exclude the matches against the minnows (Bangladesh and Zimbabwe)
Sachin Tendulkar
M innings no runs hs 100 50 avg
166 271 29 13447 248* 47 54 55.56--------all countries included
150 248 24 11709 241 39 51 52.27
(significant drop by 3.29) when Bangladesh and Zimbabwe excluded)
The average of 52.27 I shall consider as the career average for all comparison. The form factor (peak & slump) is worked out as a deviation from the career average. Also another factor considered will be the innings/100 which is an excellent indicator of consistency with which a premier batsman scores centuries.
Overall 248/39=6.36 and just for perspective Don Bradman has 80 innings for 29 tons giving the ratio of 80/29=2.76
--------------------------------------------------------
1989 start-92 end
M innings no runs hs 100 50 avg
19 30 2 1085 148* 4 4 38.75
Not really considered as it is the first few years of career. But significant indicator of future greatness when you observe the average and number of 100's as it came against fairly strong opposition and away)
---------------------------------------------------------
1993 start-97 end
M innings no runs hs 100 50 avg
37 55 6 2959 179 10 13 60.38
Excellent period for Sachin. Improvement of over 8 from his career average. 100's ratio is down to 5.5.
----------------------------------------------------------
1998 start-2002 end
M innings no runs hs 100 50 avg
39 69 6 3831 217 14 15 60.80
Statistically the greatest period for Tendulkar. An exceptional average and a 100's ratio of less than 5.
----------------------------------------------------------
2003 start-2007 end
M innings no runs hs 100 50 avg
34 57 6 2017 241* 3 13 39.54
Very poor period for Tendulkar. Drop of over 12 from his career average. A 100's ratio of 19 is a huge indicator of a slump and a long one at that i.e. 5 years. Also noted during this period is a very low average of about 27 in the 2nd, 3rd
and 4th innings of test matches. His away performance was good (46 in 17 matches) while at home he was very poor (33 in 17).
----------------------------------------------------------
2008 start-present
M innings no runs hs 100 50 avg
21 37 4 1817 160 8 6 55.06
A renaissance for the great master. His average is back closer to his career mean. 8 tons in 37 innings is a ratio of about 4.6. Home and away form has been quite brilliant.
----------------------------------------------------------
Brian Lara
M innings no runs hs 100 50 avg
131 232 6 11953 400* 34 48 52.88
overall career figures (WI and ICC XI- includes games against the minnows)
126 224 6 11517 400* 32 47 52.83
For WI excluding games against minnows- no significant drop in average
Also the ratio innings/100 stands at 224/32=7.00 slightly higher (poorer) than Tendulkar's.
---------------------------------------------------------------
1990 start-93 end
M innings no runs hs 100 50 avg
11 18 0 830 277 1 6 46.11
Early days in a brilliant career gives a fair indication of what is to follow (high risk game- few not outs) and also just 1 century (the ton was a massive 277- another indicator of things to come).
---------------------------------------------------------------
1994 start-97 end
M innings no runs hs 100 50 avg
37 64 2 3303 375 9 14 53.27
A period which showcased Lara's genius and also his form shifts. From a peak in 1994-95 his form gradually dropped close to 1998. A century every 7 innings and an average of 53.27 not far from the overall career figures.
---------------------------------------------------------------
1998 start-2001 end
M innings no runs hs 100 50 avg
35 65 2 3088 221 8 14 49.01
Lara had a brilliant series in 1999 against Australia and at the end of 2001 against Sri Lanka. In between though his form was very much patchy. Overall his average was about 3 lower than his career mark and his innings/100 was 8 (increase of 1). 1998 and 2000 were bad years but 1999 and 2001 were excellent.
---------------------------------------------------------------
2002 start-end of career (2006 end)
M innings no runs hs 100 50 avg
43 77 2 4296 400 14 13 57.28
Lara ended his career in the best of his form. His performance in 2003, 2004 and 2005 were simple extraordinary with over 1000 runs in all these years. As captain, his second coming was brilliant and he averaged 62 in 25 matches. His average is about 5 more than his career mark and his innings/100 ratio is 5.5 and a great improvement over the career mark of 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Series dominance factor
Also, just considering another factor which I would call dominance (high scoring throughout a series and dominating it with the bat).
India have typically played many 3 and 4 test series for most of his career.
I shall rank Sachin's highest performing test series ordering them by the number of matches in the series. (will exclude one off tests)
5 tests---------> 368 at 46.00 in 1991-92 Australia
4 tests---------> top 4 include 493, 401, 396 and 383
3 tests---------> top 4 include 445, 436, 428 and 402
2 tests---------> 290 and 227
-------------------------------------------------------------
West Indies played even as many as 6 tests in the mid 1990's when the team was very good still. Later the number of matches in series involving them dwindled to 3. Brian Lara had this unique ability to dominate a series like no other batsman when he started on a run. The figures below show just that.
6 tests----------> 765 in 1995
5 tests----------> 798, 466, 400 and 391
4 tests----------> 546, 531 and 500
3 tests----------> 688, 448, 393 and 345
2 tests----------> 331 and 299
--------------------------------------------------------------
After all this analysis, I come to the following conclusion which I believe is fairly justified. Tendulkar during the course of his career has had two golden periods (60+ averages) and an extremely poor period when his average fell below 40 for most part of 5 years. His batting records have been considerably improved because of 16 matches against sub standard attacks (8 100's in 16 games).
The test average eliminating these matches is marginally below Brian Lara's. Tendulkar's consistency is remarkable. His innings/100 ratio is exceptional for most part of his career except the slump period. He has never quite proceeded to dominate a series quite the way Lara has.
Brian Lara, rather surprisingly has not deviated much from his career average and innings/100. He does not do his average any favours because of his high risk game and very few not outs. His consistency is lower in the sense that good and bad years often alternate in his career. He has dominated many a series whther they of be 5 ,4 or 3 games. This remarkable aspect makes him stand out among all premier batsmen. He ended his career in supreme form and I feel he probably retired a year too early. His penchant for massive scores is seen throughout with 8 scores of 200+ knocks and 9 scores between 150 and 200.
Now for my judgment. After all what's the use of all this otherwise?..
Brian Charles Lara is to me the greatest test batsman since Don Bradman. In terms of consistency he has not been poor (though many players show better consistency). His average never quite dropped to perilous lows. His greatest ability was to take control of a series and dictate terms. It was a pity that his massive run making and insatiable appetite had to coincide with the nadir of the West Indian team.
Sachin Tendulkar on the other hand is probably the most consistent and will undoubtedly end up being the most prolific player as well when he retires. He has not dominated quality attacks in series after the mid to late 1990's when he was at his remarkable best. He has feasted on some poor bowling too during his time and this had added weight to his figures. His rate of scoring 100's is remarkable but his ability to convert the 100's to big ones including double tons etc has been found wanting.
Lara will to me remain the most exciting man to ever hold a cricket bat while Tendulkar will remain the finest and most consistent.Not much separates them in terms of stats. Lara's best is way better than any player but, in his bad patches he could looks the worst. Tendulkar, on the other hand was far more even. he did reach a high but not the dizzying heights of the Trinidadian genius. From a purely personal point of view, I'd go for the Prince of Trinidad any day as there has been no one quite like him to thrill the senses and after all what is test cricket without the thrill?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)