Sunday, April 7, 2013

Courage under fire


Often, in this bat-dominated modern age of cricket, it is very easy to lose sight of the fact that batsmen did have it tough on quite a few occasions in the past. For many years, playing on uncovered pitches after an overnight downpour was as challenging as it ever got. 'Sticky Dogs' as the pitches were referred to, were minefields that could be most unpredictable and surviving for an hour on them could be deemed as an achievement. There has been the rare occasion in the last twenty years when pitches have been as treacherous. A quality knock in these conditions has always been a stand-out feature on a batsman's resume. For many days, I have been pondering about those lesser-known, almost forgotten classics on dangerous pitches. The knocks may hardly carry the weight (in terms of runs) of a triple-century on a featherbed at Antigua or the SSC, but outlive them in memory simply because of the quality, guts, concentration and technique on display.

Here is a selection of a few of the finest such knocks. Of course, the list is hardly exhaustive and there is a significant possibility of missing out on a few gems.

1. Wally Hammond's 32 at the MCG in 1936-37: Now this match is far more renowned for Bradman's brilliant 270 and his 346-run sixth-wicket stand with Jack Fingleton, who made 136. But then, why would this 32 stand out? The match was played on a terrible MCG wicket which had turned into a 'sticky' after heavy rain. When Australia batted first, the wicket was normal and most batsmen managed to get off to good starts. England, who were up 2-0 in the series, had the upper hand at the end of day one when Australia finished 181 for 6. Overnight downpour, however, turned the match on its head. Australia's total was now more than useful. In Morris Sievers (fast medium), Bill O'Reilly(leg spin) and Chuck Fleetwood Smith (left arm chinaman), Australia had the ideal bowlers for the surface. Hammond batted beautifully for his 32, taking a few risks, and faced 88 balls, more than a third of what the England team managed (224 balls). He was out eventually to an extraordinary catch at short leg. Bradman, realising the demons in the pitch, promoted the tail-enders and came in to bat when the pitch was docile. The rest, as they say, is history!

2. Len Hutton's 30 at The Oval in 1948: Hutton, the Yorkshire classicist, had started his career with a bang, scoring 364 at The Oval in 1938 as England beat Australia by a massive innings and 579 runs. However, his superlative 30 out of a total of 52 against Lindwall, Miller and Johnston at the same venue ten years later easily ranks as one of his finest displays. England were being outplayed totally by Bradman's invincibles and trailed 3-0 going into the final Test at The Oval. Heavy rains had lashed the ground leaving the pitch completely unprepared. Lindwall was lethal and burst through the England middle order after lunch with 5 for 8 in eight overs. Hutton played a masterly knock dominated by a solid defence. He was the last man out to a leg side catch off Lindwall for 30 off 147 balls. In all, the entire England team managed to last a total of just 253 balls. The match though, is more famous for Bradman's duck in his final Test.

3. Len Hutton's 62 in Brisbane in 1950: Harold Pinter, the great English playwright once wrote a one-line poem that said "I saw Len Hutton in his prime. Another time, another time". The period just after the war must have been Hutton's prime. England had done well to restrict Australia to just 228 with Neil Harvey scoring 74. A storm left the ground inundated and play resumed only late on the third day. By now, the pitch was totally unpredictable and tested every aspect of a batsman's technique. England declared their innings at 68/7 in the hope of making Australia bat on the dangerous track. Australia were rocked by Alec Bedser and themselved declared at 32/7, the lowest ever a team has declared on. The target of 193, however, proved to be virtually impossible as England were reduced to 30/6. Hutton, who had been asked to bat lower down the order to provide stability, responded in a manner that left Australia stunned. With only the tail for company, he launched an assault on the bowling playing drives and lofting effortlessly. Neither the turn nor the bounce in the wicket fazed the great batsman as he kept producing superb shots. It was not to be, however, as the remaining two wickets fell. Hutton remained unbeaten on 62 in 90 minutes - perhaps one of the all-time great batting performances.

4. Brian Lara's 45 in Barbados in 1997: Lara took over the captaincy of West Indies after a period of turmoil. The home team had managed to score 298 with the help of Shivnarine Chanderpaul's century. India, led by Tendulkar's excellent 92, managed to eke out a small, but valuable lead of 21 on the surface. In the second innings, the pitch had turned into a minefield. Alternate balls skipped along the ground and bounced over the wicketkeeper. Even a moderate Indian attack was looking extremely dangerous. Lara, West Indies' solitary hope, brought out his repertoire of strokes and played a few gorgeous drives. He was fifth out with the total on 86. A few runs from the tail took the target to 120 which eventually proved more than enough on a Barbados pitch, which lived up to its reputation of being a result-oriented wicket.

5. VVS Laxman (69), Sachin Tendulkar (55) in Mumbai 2004: Led by Adam Gilchrist in the first three Tests, Australia had produced a stunning team performance to take an unassailable 2-0 lead going into the fourth Test in Mumbai. With humiliation staring them in the face, India responded by going for a wicket that was likely to turn square from ball one. And the wicket did not disappoint! India were bowled out for just 104 with Dravid standing amidst the ruins with 31. Australia, led by the in-form Damien Martyn, grabbed a lead of 99 which was massive in the circumstances. In India's second innings, Laxman and Tendulkar, who had both done little of note in the series (Tendulkar missed the first two Tests and Laxman had a poor run), combined to turn the match around. Tendulkar was more aggressive and pulled off high-quality shots against both the pacemen and spinners. He reached his half-century in just 62 balls and fell eventually for 55. Laxman gained in confidence soon and provided glimpses of his shot making during the immortal 281. The innings ended swiftly after Laxman fell but India had the runs on the board. On a wicket where 38 wickets fell in just two days, Australia fell short by 13 runs chasing 107.

Saturday, March 30, 2013

Random distribution


A random crossword... variety of topics.. have fun!

Please message me on fb or mail me the answers at madhusudhanramakrishnan@gmail.com. Kindly refrain from posting as comment on the blog page/on the wall on fb.

Across

3. Plays colonel Trautman in the Rambo series -(7,6)
5. Word for slaughterhouse (french origin)- (8)
7. Author of Gulag Archipelago - (11)
12. Eusebio turns it around 0-3 to 5-3 in the WC. Venue? -(8)
13. 'Mere pas maa hai' - who plays the ma in this Hindi movie which features this legendary line?-(6,3)
14. Joseph Von Ryan in the war classic - (5, 7)
17. India-Pak ODI game abandoned midway after news of Indira Gandhi's assassination. Where was the match?- (7)
18. German invasion of the Soviet Union - (10)
19. Produce 'seedless' fruit - (13)
20. Who said this about Sanskrit? "more perfect than the Greek, more copious than the Latin" (7,5)

Answers (across)
Richard Crenna
Abattoir
Alexander Solzenitsyn
Goodison Park
Nirupa Roy
Frank Sinatra
Sialkot
Operation Barbarossa
Parthenocarpy
Sir William Jones

Down

1. Middle name of MS Subbulakshmi - (14)
2. A call for a run from him should be treated as no more than a basis for negotiation. Who said this about Denis Compton? - (6,6)
4. Property of Carbon to form long chains - (10)
6. Genetic disease predominantly found in Ashkenazi Jews (3,5)
8. The Nautillus' captain in Jules Verne's classic (4)
9. Traditional practice in Wimbledon abandoned in 2003 -(6)
10. What do AR stand for in the expansion of HAART? (4, 10)
11. Led the Khmer Rouge for 35 years - (3,3)
15. Krishna:Panchajanya::Arjuna:?- (9)
16. Genus of the bacteria causing cholera - (6)

Answers (Down)
Shanmugavadivu
Trevor Bailey
Catenation
Tay Sachs
Nemo
Curtsy
Anti retroviral
Pol Pot
Devadatta
Vibrio

Sunday, October 7, 2012

Retribution

I still cry when I recall the events of March 14 1996. The World Cup was the biggest event I could imagine and West Indies had been robbed of their chance to win it! You may ask why WI and why not India? Nothing matched the charisma of WI and the enjoyment they brought to the millions of viewers. The mid 90s however had been the beginning of the fall for WI. They had lost the Test series at home to Australia and were well beaten in the tri-series in Australia in 95-96. Come the World Cup though, all I wanted was Brian Lara to turn up and fire. Curtly Ambrose and Courtney Walsh were there too. How could they not perform?? Really, how? In their opening match, West Indies beat Zimbabwe fairly comfortably but came up short against India. The dropped catch by Courtney Browne cost them dear as Sachin Tendulkar made 70 to set up India's chase in Gwalior. And yeah, Brian Lara was incorrectly ruled out caught behind to add to my woes. Worse was to come. WI refused to tour Sri Lanka for security reasons and were docked two points. I still can't believe this happened. Sri Lanka got four points without playing Aus and WI. Next came the moment I almost had a heart attack. WI were complacent beyond belief in Pune and went down by 73 runs to Kenya. Yeah, you read it right - Kenya!!! Was this the end of the road. Well, everybody thought so. Not me! Certainly not. I had watched the team with so much enthusiasm and affection that I could not even bring myself to believe they would not qualify for the quarter-finals. In Jaipur, they hauled themselves up and beat Australia with Richie Richardson scoring 93 and Lara 60. Job done?? Hardly. The next game was against South Africa on Mar 11th. South Africa, you must be kidding me. No team stood a chance against them. SA had won five out of five in their group and were the epitome of consistency so far.

I had only moved to my new place on Mar 9th, the night of the humdinger between India and Pakistan in Bangalore. On March 11th, the third and fourth quarter-finals were played. For now, I could care less about the fourth (between Australia and NZ)in Madras. Would Lara, my favourite batsman (now you know my blog's name!) deliver? Would he? I prayed far more than I ever have for any bloody exam. And deliver he did. Lara played one of the most amazing ODI innings I have seen against a quality SA attack to push WI to 264. He had not hit a boundary for nearly 23 balls but opened up and smashed a century off just 83 balls (one behind the then Lloyd record. WI bowled and fielded with purpose. SA were bowled out for just 245 and I just could not believe my eyes. Losing to Kenya and then taking out Aus and SA. Stuff of dreams and surely, WI could go the distance?

Aus entered the semis against WI as firm favourites despite their loss in Jaipur. In the quarter-final against NZ, Aus had made a mockery of a tight chase of 287 with Mark Waugh scoring yet another century (his third of the tournament). How would WI deal with this batting line-up? The answer was emphatic. Curtly Ambrose, Mark Waugh's nemesis for years, produced a dream spell to remove him and Ricky Ponting. Ian Bishop bowled Mark Taylor and Steve Waugh to leave Australia rocking at 15/4!! Was it all over? I started dreaming of Lahore. Not just yet said Australia's crisis man Michael Bevan. Bevan had only recently stunned WI on New Year's day 96 at the SCG orchestrating a tense chase of 173 after Australia looked dead and buried at 38/6. In Mohali too, Bevan and Stuart Law set about the recovery process. Law, lucky to gain a reprieve for a close lbw call, made 72 and Bevan made 69 as Aus reached a competitive 207. But that should really not have been a tough target considering the batting might WI had.

Shivnarine Chanderpaul and Courtney Browne started fairly well until Browne hit a long hop from Shane Warne back to the bowler. In came Lara and set about playing some outstanding shots. He certainly was on a roll and made run scoring on a difficult pitch look ridiculously easy. With the score on 93 after Lara had produced a gem of a cover drive, Steve Waugh bowled a wonderful slower off-cutter to bowl Lara. Still Chanderpaul and Richardson stood firm and guided WI to within touching distance. At 165/2 in 41 overs, I sniffed Lahore. Chanders was out to a tired shot caught at mid on. Then came the horror show. The pressure got to WI as Jimmy Adams fell trying to sweep Warne. But what was Mr Venkataraghavan doing there? He gave a terrible caught behind decision to end Ottis Gibson's innings and a debatable lbw call against Ian Bishop who was a more than useful lower order batsman. In between, Keith Arthurton slashed at a wide one from Damien Fleming to end a miserable tournament. Richardson swept Warne mightily only this time for the other umpire BC Cooray to stop it with his head (bloody head!!). A certain boundary averted! The WI captain meanwhile played his hook shots superbly and kept WI in the game. With nine runs needed off the last over (a tie was enough to take WI through courtesy their win in Jaipur), Fleming stepped up to bowl it. Richardson swung the first ball for four to fine leg. He then ran a totally unnecessary run as Ambrose was run out by Healy. Next came the dreaded moment. Walsh walked out, had a word and went up to face Fleming. What was Walsh thinking as he had a swipe at the ball? I saw the stumps rattled and could not believe my eyes. I saw Richardson's face and started sobbing inconsolably. I cried all night only for dad to reassure me that WI would come back. But deep down, I knew it was hard, almost impossible for WI to resurrect themselves after this shocking loss. Alas, my friends (Deepak and Jayanth) have often told me that they believe Wi would never have slipped this far below had they gone on to lift the 96 WC. I think so too. The tears stopped the next day but the pain did not end. I was witness to 16 years of struggle and only the great memories of WI's achievements from the decades gone by kept me glued to the game...

Until...Oct 2012. WI had their best chance in a format I hate. I have been a Test lover and still continue to enjoy the traditional form. But then, I watched the tournament with the hope that WI could spring a surprise or two. Was I being too demanding in asking for consistency across a tournament though? WI had the necessary luck in the group stages and the Super Eights. Now they were up against the old adversary Australia. On form, WI had no chance. Given the record in major tournaments, it was a no contest. But something told me WI had it in them this time. It was seriously retribution time. Time to erase the dark memories of Mohali 96. Richardson and Gibson in the staff and Bishop a part of the commentary team. Wouldn't they have wished for the same? It turned out to be a no contest all right! WI hammered Australia all round the park to amass 205 and bowled Australia out for just 131. Really, I felt the Gods had been kind this time. I remember being taken to a temple of a particular deity some time in 1995. The deity was supposed to be powerful enough to grant any wish instantly. While everyone prayed for academic and financial success, my mind had no other thought but a WI win. I am still ragged about making such a wish but would I have done different in retrospect? Certainly not!

There was one small hurdle (ok large) to clear though. The hosts Sri Lanka had crushed WI in the tournament earlier and in three previous meetings. WI stood a very small chance of upsetting the trend. And once their talisman Chris Gayle went, the odds were even more in favour of the Sri Lankans. In stepped Marlon Samuels. He had shown glimpses of his talent in 2002 in India but went off the boil for years. In the 2007 WC game against England, he was responsible for Brian Lara's run out in what turned out to be Lara's last match. I never forgave him for that. But in the last two years, Samuels is a changed man. He has demonstrated terrific consistency in all forms of the game and on the night of Oct 7, 2012, he was unstoppable. He smote the 'unhittable' Lasith Malinga for a number of sixes and dragged WI out of a hole. Once WI reached 138, I knew it was game on. Now for the bowling. WI had an attack that lacked discipline and intensity. On this night, however, they had oodles of everything an attack needs. They struck getting the dangerous Dilshan early and pressured Sangakkara into making an error. Soon, the Sri Lankan captain Jayawardene was to follow and I could not stop jumping around like a kid. Wi withstood a late fightback from the hosts and held their nerve. When the final catch was taken, tears flowed down my eyes. I could not believe what was happening. The very reason I love the game has been WI. The only batsman I will watch if I have a minute to live is Lara. What is there not to like about this team? The greatest entertainers the sport has seen and certainly, the most dominant at one point too. Memories of 96 flashed by my eyes and I could visualize Richardson thinking the same word too : Retribution!

Friday, April 20, 2012

A quality discussion, and analysing southpaws

When Albert Einstein was asked to explain his complex theory of relativity to laymen, he did so pithily - "When a man sits with a pretty girl for an hour, it seems like a minute. But let him sit on a hot stove for a minute and it's longer than any hour. That's relativity." As an analogy, when I was working at my previous firm, every day seemed like a year. The people were nice and I never really was the kind who worked hard but still I felt a lacuna in my life. I just wasn't doing something that came to me naturally. Since the move to Cricinfo on April 19 2010, I cannot help but feel that the void has been filled. Talking, discussing and watching cricket are about as amazing as sitting with the 'pretty girl'. The incredible journey has already touched two years and it is impossible to imagine that this has been the case. I have not been in too many jobs to compare and contrast but can safely attest that the workplace is among the finest one can hope to have. An immensely knowledgeable set of colleagues each with his/her own interests united by a common love- for sport. Meeting cricketing greats, listening to them talk about the game, exchange views on football & tennis, playing quizzes on the fly and getting the opportunity to read, interpret and indulge in cricket stats has given me the chance to live my biggest passion. My friends and family have been the greatest support during my trying times and have encouraged me throughout to excel. Just yesterday, i witnessed numerous 'likes' and comments on an audio clip that I recorded (co-incidentally on the two-year anniversary). Not only does this thrill me, it also gives me additional motivation to enjoy what I do and work on fulfilling my other dreams.

I started humbly by writing stuff on cricket and sports on this blog. Life has come a long way since that November afternoon in 2005 when I wrote my first piece on Brian Lara, my favourite batsman. I guess that explains the name of the blog. Writing was hugely enjoyable and provided me with a chance to get noticed and helped me land a job in Cricinfo. There has been something I have wanted to do for a while now and this analysis is a tribute to the blog and to my family and friends without whom the dream would have hardly been realised.

Part 1: Quality factor

For years, a debate that has raged on in cricket is about the quality of batsmen that a bowler has dismissed. Whenever discussions on fast bowlers start, there are many who wonder if Fred Trueman's demolition job of a hapless Indian team in the early 1950s is something worth considering. What about Australia's easy wins against a declining West Indies team or Sri Lanka's strolls against Bangladesh/Zimbabwe. Now, I have not been able to come up with a definitive list of quality of wickets taken by measuring the averages of each of the batsmen dismissed simply because of the enormity of the task. It is something, however, that I am more than likely to embark on soon. Still, the curiosity got the better of me and I decided to analyse the wickets quality by the batting position of the batsmen dismissed. Although night watchmen can create some confusion, they can be ignored in the overall picture.

The overall batting average over the years has hovered around the 30 mark. It is unlikely to change much given the days of bowlers dominating are long gone. So, I have considered batting averages for each batting position and compared them to the overall average to provide a glimpse of the quality of the batsman (at each position). Of course, this can be extended to each team, individual players and each era. But then, the calculations involved are far more complicated. This, I believe, serves as a fairly good indicator of wicket quality.

In a nutshell, if a bowler picks up 200 wickets overall and has picked up 30 opening batsmen (No. 1 position), the quality for each of the 30 wickets is calculated using (37.12/30.16) where 37.12 is the batting average for openers and 30.16 is the overall average in Tests. Finally, after calculating the quality this way for the number of wickets the bowler has claimed at each position, the numbers are averaged to provide an overall quality measure.

Graph measuring wicket quality of bowlers (300-plus wickets)

When I finally calculated for all the bowlers with 300-plus wickets, there were a few surprises. Chaminda Vaas topped the list followed by Makhaya Ntini. Both were significantly more threatening with the new ball and less likely to run riot with a slightly older ball. Hence the high percentage of top-five batsmen dismissals for these players. Allan Donald and Glenn McGrath take the next two spots. Overall, there are nine bowlers who have a quality factor greater than 100. Needless to say, all are pace bowlers since they primarily get to bowl at the top-order batsmen. Spinners, however, are often the key on dusty tracks and enter the attack quite early. Kumble, Vettori and Muralitharan, by virtue of being the lead bowlers in weak bowling units, have picked up a significant number of top-order wickets. Shane Warne, who figures at the bottom of the list (92% quality) played for most part of his career alongside McGrath, who was outstanding against the top-order batsmen. Warne often came in with two or three wickets down and weaved his magic against the middle order. Although he figures at the bottom of the spinners' list, it is more so because of the nature of the Australian bowling attack in which there were excellent wicket-taking fast bowlers.

Graph of percentage of top-five wickets

Wasim Akram, arguably the finest left-arm fast bowler, figures rather low on the quality front. Akram played with Waqar Younis and both, together, formed one of the most potent combinations in Tests. Akram had remarkable variety and excelled with the old ball. His ability to generate late swing (reverse swing) made him lethal against the middle and lower order batsmen. His presence at the top of the list of tailender wicket-takers confirms this. Warne, with his variations, was also a crucial bowler for Australia when it came to cleaning up the opposition lower order. he tops the list of lower-order wicket-takers (8-11) followed by Lance Gibbs and Harbhajan Singh.

Graph of percentage of lower-order (8-11) wickets

I did another exercise to dispel a few doubts. Many have doubted Muralitharan's ability to perform outside Sri Lanka. While it is true that he has got a huge percentage of his wickets at home, he has been responsible for Sri Lanka's resurgence as a competitive Test team outside Asia. His top-order wickets percentage goes up to 49.67% in matches against top teams (excluding Bangladesh and Zimbabwe) and crosses 50 in matches against these teams outside Asia. This is enough to suggest that Muralitharan was more often than not Sri Lanka's go-to man against the top teams when the other bowlers struggled for impact. And outside Asia, on pitches less conducive to spin, he raised his game even further to give his team a chance.

Part 2: Southpaws rule?

Left-handers. Boon or bane? They certainly provide the variety that is essential to sport. Laver, Connors, McEnroe and now Nadal, have risen to the top of tennis with a playing style that puts off right handers. To begin with, they get to serve to the right-handers' backhand on the 'ad' court when under pressure. The reverse does not hold good though. Righties cant quite do the same to the their left-handed counterparts and end up feeding the powerful forehand. In Nadal's case, Djokovic seems to have an answer for everything but overall, Nadal has troubled everyone including Federer, who is arguably one of the finest players to grace the same. Then doesn't this lead us to the question whether being left-handed gives someone an advantage, perhaps an even unfair one?

Left to right-hander wickets ratio for bowlers

In cricket, left-handers are termed more graceful, languid and pleasing. Cricket aficionados rejoice when they watch a Gower drive or a Lara cut. Is the whole 'grace' thing hyped or is there substance behind some claims? In the beginning, i.e. 1877-1914, there were precious few left-handers. They constituted less than 12% of the total number of batsmen. However, as the decades rolled by, the percentage gradually rose from 13.68% in the period between the World Wars to around 16% around 1970. The next two decades saw a rise in the number but that was nothing compared to the proliferation of lefties post 2000. In the last 12 years (affording some overlap), nearly 26% of batsmen playing are lefties and it is needless to say that bowlers have had a difficult time in adapting.

Left-hander % across the years

Now, all this is not enough to say that being a leftie guarantees more success. By analysing the relationship between individual scores and batsman type, one can perhaps figure out if there is a benefit of being a left-hander. Lara, Hayden, Sobers, Jayasuriya, Gayle have all made triple-centuries which lends weight to the argument that being a left-hander might just assist a batsman to last longer and hence make bigger scores. Let's look at a few numbers though to substantiate the claim. Across all sets of scores considered, left-handers have a significant increase in their percentage when it comes to 300-plus scores. Between 0 and 299, the percentage contribution of left-handers has been almost always around the 25% mark. The only plausible explanation is that left-handers are more likely to negotiate the new ball successfully in the beginning of the innings and later on in the knock. Right-handers are more vulnerable to the new ball at later stages of their innings simply because most bowlers are able to adapt their styles better to bowl to righties. It might never have a perfect explanation but makes for an interesting stat.

Right and left-hander % across various score ranges

All the tables are sorted and provided in the excel sheet below



Friday, March 23, 2012

All about stats

Quite a few articles have been written about stats. Some question their relevance while others exaggerate their significance. Whatever be the case, stats and numbers have played an integral role in attracting me to the game of cricket and my love for the game is sustained because of the magic of numbers. Here is a crossword I designed purely based on records, scores, performances from the past. Best of luck solving it. Be sure to have your numbers hat on. You'll need it big time! PS: Try and send the responses by email to madhusudhanramakrishnan@gmail.com so that comments on this page don't end up giving away the answers. Thanks.
Across

3. 93, 8032, 57.78, 26/30 --- (6)

5. 503, 606 and 117/0. what's the venue? -- (6)

6. Replaced by ? after 18 and 1 (675-run loss)--(9)

9. 26 wickets to give Aussies their only win in WI (1973) till Taylor's team in 1995-- (6)

10. 7/1 spell and 9/86.. wow! -- (7,5)

14. top scorer in 75, 127, 327, 276/5 (8)

16. 127 and 0 in this game 256 547 471 164 (9)

17. 136 in the legendary 346 (9)

18. 178, adds 106 with Walsh (yes am not kidding)!-- (6)

20. Poor captain who ran into Don's red hot streak 270, 212, 169 (5)

21. 182, 165 and 224- top scores in the three Tests of a series. Keeper of losing side? (6) last name only

23. 58/5 followed by 222 stand. where? -- (8)

24. Dravid & VVS(stand Adelaide 2003-04) - (Lara against SA, WC 2003) = glorious knock that will stand test of time.(7)

25. scores 285, 411 stand to rescue England (5,3) --

26. Aussie last-wicket pair snatch tie against SA... batsman was left on 43 off 32. If I remember right, had a one run short :) -- (5)

29. 7/46 and 7/44 helps defend 85 -- (9)

30. Don- 173 and the man in question (182) set up chase of 404 (6)

Down

1. 5 tons, 827 runs in series but lose 0-3... (7)

2. 8/92 and 6/57-- (7)

4. 356th?? , a record, who writes your scripts?-- (4, 5)

7. 905 at 113.25 -- (7)

8. 6/16 WI crumble to 53.. shock defeat.. but comeback to bowl opponents for 131 and 77 next Test :)-- (5)

11.Aus lead at Eden, Fleming against SL and ? scored the same against Aus (Durban)-- (7)

12.Nadkarni 21 maidens in a row.. but 137 dots in a row? -- (8)

13.as many wickets as 232/4 to 608/5 -- (8)

15.910. 32 and 27 all out. Poor losers. Name them. -- (4, 6, 4)

19.Run out for 260, ends stand of 446 -- (5)

22.8/3 soon 26/4 scores 100 of 198 -- (3,6)

27.twin 65's (gabba), 261 (nottingham), died at 42.... connect -- (7)

28.Handles the ball on 133, triggers collapse (5)

Friday, March 9, 2012

The hero one could aspire to be

I have always wondered if Matthew Syed thought of Rahul Dravid before he wrote Bounce. In his superb book, Syed goes on to assert that there is no such thing as genius/natural talent and that success is purely a result of practice and more practice. I wouldn't go so far as to agree completely with the author but he does have a point. Dravid was never among the most gifted batsmen of his generation. Nor was he charismatic- the bums on seats type of player. But then, he was normal, simple and in these traits lie the man's appeal. He worked hard on his technique, proceeded to hit thousands of balls in the nets, learned to sharpen his eyesight and reflexes through sheer effort. Did all this pay off? Yes, most certainly. Dravid could never improvise like a Tendulkar or Sehwag nor did he possess the ability to play three shots for one delivery. But he definitely had mastered the most crucial aspect of batting - that of knowing which shot to play for a particular ball. He had boundless patience and could seemingly stretch it further on demand. He could withstand the toughest conditions and bowling with a bloody mindedness that was scarcely believable.

Dravid had all the runs and centuries to prove that he was among the game's finest. But that is not what set him apart. He did make the game look like a challenge- especially Test cricket. I have often believed that Test cricket is analogous to life. A normal man cannot waft away the difficulties and trials in life but is instead forced to deal with them step by step. Dravid, similarly ensured that he would methodically deal with the challenges in Tests. He blunted the bowlers in the most difficult conditions with his unerring patience and determination. The cornerstones of Dravid's success were his self-belief and intense focus. There were occasions when he was beaten or dismissed playing a rash shot but then, he would be the first to admit his mistake and correct it. Test cricket has charmed audiences because of the variety of characters it has produced. Dravid was one whom the common man could relate to more than anybody else. He was modest, diligent, calm and well-mannered. Dravid took the sport seriously but never transgressed the line. He had an iron will to win but never let it affect his sportsmanspirit.

Dravid finished as the world's second-highest run-getter behind Tendulkar and the fourth-highest century scorer behind Tendulkar, Kallis and Ponting. However, it was never about numbers for the man. He chose to maintain a low profile and funnily enough, almost all his major achievements were also eclipsed or cast to the background by other incidents. His vital 180 in Kolkata, 2001, is almost forgotten in light of Laxman's immortal 281. Not that the man cared. He always put the team ahead of himself and this is reflected in his final decision to retire. Given his glorious career, he probably had the right to play on and choose a farewell at home. But then, that would never be Dravid-like. He always performed like it was his duty and never once did he consider himself better than the others around. One could find an analogy with the quiet worker in a company who is responsible for the strong foundation and success but never quite gets the credit he deserves. Dravid was the pivot around which the rest of the team revolved. He performed when it mattered the most and when the chips were down. He did have a few chinks- just two centuries against Australia and South Africa being the most notable. But then, a wall is not remembered for a few loose bricks but is instead respected for its overall stability. In the end, Dravid proved that he is a hero worth emulating both as a cricketer and human being. His individual innings may always take the backseat but his contribution to the team for 16 years can never be measured in terms of statistics. He always will be the hero one can and must aspire to be.

Thursday, February 9, 2012

Know old Hindi songs/movies? Here you go..

The period between the 1940-1980 marked the golden era of Hindi film music. Some of the best lyricists, composers and singers played their part in making the music in that period immortal. Here is a crossword based on the movies, the songs, the singers and what not. So, play on- u can listen to the music too while you solve this.. only don't google :)

Across

2. Music director for the classic 'Kuhu Kuhu bole Koyaliya' sung by Rafi and Lata from Suvarna Sundari - clue is it is originally a Telugu and then Tamil Movie in which Ghantasala and P Susheela sing. (11, 3)

-- Adinarayana Rao 6. Singer of Bole re Papihara (4,6)

--- Vani Jairam 8. Voice for Rishi Kapoor in Bobby (10, 5)

--- Shailendra Singh 10. O Duniya ke Rakhwale - enough said - name of movie (5,5)

--Baiju Bawra 11. Singer of 'Na Jao sayyan' from Guru dutt's 'Sahib Biwi aur Gulaam' (5,4)

-- Geeta Dutt 12. Hum Dono - Jaidev - ? (Lyricist -first name only)- (5)

--- Sahil Ludhianvi 14. Music director for the immortal song Kabhi Kabhie (7)

--- Khayyam 15. AVM Productions' movie with songs 'aaja sanam madhur chandni' 'yeh raat bheegi bheegi' and 'rasik balma' - (5,5)

-- Chori Chori 17. Music director for the classic movie Anarkali featuring the song Yeh Zindagi usiki hai (10)- last name only

-- C Ramachandra 18. Male singer of the song picturised on Sunil Dutt/Nutan where he teaches her to sing and corrects her pronunciation (6)

-- Mukesh 19. 'chingari koi bhadke' 'raina beeit jaaye' 'yeh kya hua' 'kuch to log kahenge'- director of the movie with these classic songs (6,7)

-- Shakti Samanta 20. Director of the movie with the songs Suhana Safar saat and Aaja re pardesi (5,3)

-- Bimal Roy 21. The trinity- rafi, naushad and - (7- first name only)

-- Shakeel Badayuni 22. Kamal Amrohi's classic movie with the songs Chalte Chalte (Lata) and Inhi Logon Ne (7)

-- Pakeezah Down

1. Bhupinder & Lata's 'Beeti na bitai raina' is from this movie (8)

-- Parichay 3. One of Hindi cinema's greatest music directors who went through a career without a single song with Lata (2,6)

-- O P Nayyar 4. Lata sang this legendary singer's 'soja rajkumari' in her album Shraddhanjali as a tribute (2, 6)-

-- K L Saigal 5. Singer of song 'Zindagi kaisi hai paheli' from Anand (5,3)

-- Manna Dey 7. Movie based on Indo-China war (song Zara si aahat- Lata & Madan Mohan combo)- (8)

-- Haqeeqat 8. Timeless classic which Talat Mahmood almost never sang (because SD Burman found him smoking outside recording room) Name the movie (7)

-- Sujatha 9. Movie where Kishore sings for both the male and female voices- Aakhe seedi lagi (4,6)

-- Half Ticket 12. Song picturised on Farokh sheikh and Deepti Naval is in this movie (5,5)-sung by the ghazal king Jagjit Singh

-- Saath Saath 13. Movie which has a famous song with Dev Anand and Nutan on bicycles (6,5)

-- Paying Guest 16. Movie for which Laxmikant Pyarelal won their first Filmfare award for a great song Chahoonga main tujhe by Rafi (5)

-- Dosti 20. Ketaki Gulab Juhi sung by Bhimsen Joshi and Manna Dey (1956 movie)- (6,5)

-- Basant Bahar