Thursday, July 21, 2011

DVD Reviews: Fire in Babylon and From the Ashes: Excellent recreation and terrific entertainment

Fire in Babylon: The story of the outstanding West Indies cricket team of the 1970s and 1980s



A video that I had been waiting to get my hands on did not disappoint. For someone who grew up listening to heroic achievements of West Indian greats, and idolised their top performers, this movie was a Godsend. I had read about West Indian history and followed their cricket for years, but the movie claimed to provide me with something that I had never quite seen- rare footage of classic match-action and interviews with the best players of a bygone era. The story itself is woven around the tale of how prevalent racism was in the early days of Caribbean cricket, and how important it was for the natives to reclaim their identity. Although it is not clear how many players shared these sentiments, it becomes quite easy to understand that most of them wished to make the cricket field a platform where they could perform and demonstrate to the 'masters' (whites) that they could compete and surpass the best around. The movie traces the roots of cricket in the Caribbean back to the early days of Headley and Constantine till the 1960 series against Australia when Frank Worrell was appointed captain and in effect became the first black captain to lead the West Indies. Cricket remains the only sport where players from all islands, so disparate in nature and way of life, come together and the first instance of this unity was seen under Worrell. Perhaps, more importantly, the West Indies became a far more competitive side intent on erasing the tag of 'Calypso entertainers' who mostly enjoyed the game and did not care much about victory.

The 1960-61 series in Australia was played to full houses and the quality was top-class. Worrell's team was given a ticker-tape farewell in Melbourne and this was the start of an era in which West Indies would go on to become a genuine competitor. However, the form tapered off in the early 1970s and in 1975-76, the West Indians were humiliated 5-1 in Australia. They were stunned by the wild crowds and aggressive fast bowling of Lillee and Thomson. Racist taunts added to the embarrassment. Following a 1-1 draw in the home series against India, Clive Lloyd, who was perilously close to losing his captaincy, embarked on a move that was to revolutionise the game. He chose to pack his side with four fast bowlers who would relentlessly pummel and pepper the opposition with hostile pace and bounce. Tony Greig's unfortunate grovel' remark touched a raw nerve, and West Indies, led by Viv Richards' batting and Michael Holding's blinding pace annihilated England. Packer's World Series Cricket came and went but had a positive effect on the West Indies team who seemed to discover the joy of playing together and winning. England stood no chance any more but the big challenge lay in winning in Australia, something no West Indian team had ever achieved previously. They duly went on to crush Australia unleashing a barrage of short-pitched bowling. The press tried to curtail the use of bouncers and devise tactics to nullify the threat posed by the Caribbean pace bowlers. It was, however, not hostile bowling alone, but a brilliant combination of aggressive bowling and batting which led the West Indies to the top of the world. The icing on the cake came when Lloyd' team won 5-0 in England, an unprecedented achievement. Despite the protests against the bowling, very few had answers to the quality of the West Indies. The film beautifully portrays the rise and provides a strong emphasis on the background of racism and torture that proved to be a motivation for most members of the great team, especially Richards.

For cricket fans in this generation who have grown up wishing to know more about the era when the Caribbean Kings lorded over the cricketing world, the movie is perfect. The DVD is a must-own for a cricket aficionado. It is packed with extra features including interviews with batsmen who faced up to the bowling and an interview with David Frith, the former editor of Wisden, who does not quite approve of the nature of the bowling. Overall, but for a few glitches in the footage, and for the fact that there could have been some more emphasis on the 1960s team, the movie is a great one and one to add to the collection.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From the Ashes: the story of Ian Botham masterminding England's remarkable comeback in the Ashes 1981



There are very few stories in sport that transcend eras and occupy a place in the list of immortal achievements. One such is the story of Ian Botham's outstanding performances in the Ashes series in 1981 when he, almost singlehandedly, took England to the promised land from a position where they stood no chance whatsoever.
The movie considers the political situation in England and talks about the unrest prevalent at that time. Innumerable strikes and violence were rife in England in the first few months of 1981 and there was very little that could be done to improve the mood of the nation. The focus shifts to the cricket where the picture was gloomy too. Botham, who had been offered captaincy at the young age of 24, struggled for impact against the powerful West Indies and his captaincy was hanging by a thread as England took on Australia in the series that mattered. Dropped catches and ordinary bowling led to a defeat in the first Test and in the second Test (Botham's last chance to redeem himself), Australia were denied victory by the rain. Botham's form, however, was in the doldrums as he was dismissed for a pair, lasting just three balls in the match. Onto the third Test and Botham was replaced as captain by the scholarly Mike Brearley, who was described by the opposition as someone who could not bat, bowl or field. But lead he could! Brearley seemed to strike a chord perfectly with his beleaguered team mates and when Botham and Willis were chosen to play, England had hope. Quickly, the hope disappeared when Australia racked up over 400 and shot England out for just 174 with only Botham scoring a half-century. Australia enforced the follow on and England were on the ropes at 105/5 when Botham walked in. The movie packs the sequence with excellent interviews. Gideon Haigh, Kim Hughes (the Australian captain), Rodney Marsh among others have painted a picture which seems to bring the series to life. Botham, joined by Graham Dilley at 135/7, decided to enjoy himself, and with nothing to lose, swung away merrily at the bowling. Soon, the situation turned grim for Australia, and they were left chasing 130 for a 2-0 win. Botham's extraordinary 149* was indeed the stuff of dreams, and Bob Willis, who until the start of the game, was hardly a certainty to play, lit up the stage with a superb display of 8/43 to bowl Australia out for 111. England had won after following on and the nation was on its feet.

In the next Test at Edgbaston, Botham was central to a heist as he picked up five wickets for one run to snuff out Australia's chase when they seemed well on course for an easy win. Australia never recovered and Botham cracked another hundred at Old Trafford to crush Australia 3-1. The movie is narrated superbly and the story has been presented interestingly. After hearing for years about the drama of July-August 1981 and Botham's greatness, it is time to see it for real. Another great DVD to add to the colelction!

Sunday, July 10, 2011

Sudden yet Seamless: the enduring charm of tennis





Novak Djokovic's recent Wimbledon triumph is yet another addition to the long list of surprises that make tennis a marvellous game to follow. One could ask, what is unique about surprises in tennis? The appeal of the game lies in the fact that these unexpected results are just so logical and predictable that anything other than these periodic shocks may be construed as uncharacteristic. The talented Serbian is no stranger to Grand Slam finals having won the Australian Open in 2008 and making the US Open final in 2007 and 2010. However, his show in 2011 is nothing short of astounding. After a brilliant display in the Australian Open, he ran up a streak of 41 consecutive wins in 2011 before a defeat to Roger Federer in the semi-final at Roland Garros. Although people cannot be faulted for assuming that the end of the streak would restore the Federer-Nadal domination, there was something different about Djokovic's run. He had defeated Rafael Nadal four times in four ATP finals in a year, a feat even the great Federer could not achieve. Two of these wins came on clay, a surface where Nadal has been near-invincible. To anyone doubting that tennis is just as cerebral a sport as it is physical, the psychological advantage the Serb had over the Mallorcan was perfect evidence. The tennis quality on display in the second set was reminiscent of Pete Sampras' remarkable performance in the Wimbledon 1999 final when Andre Agassi was left high and dry. Nadal, the supreme athlete, was dumbfounded by the angles that Djokovic managed to find with uncanny regularity. It might have come as a shock to many who had seen Nadal hold a 10-2 record in Grand Slam finals till the Wimbledon final, but to me the result was something I was very used to- tennis had always managed to serve these up from time to time.

This was my 20th Wimbledon. Ever since I watched Agassi's heroics in 1992, I had witnessed a remarkable pattern of rise and dominance in men's tennis. Actually, the pattern goes back well into the 1970s. Bjorn Borg's domination of the lawns of Wimbledon was unprecedented in the open era, but after the brilliant display by the brash, yet highly gifted John McEnroe in the 1980 final, it seemed like Borg's time was about to run out. McEnroe defeated Borg in the 1981 final and also in the US open final in the same year, prompting Borg to retire at just 25 with 11 titles. The McEnroe show was not as complete, but the most unbelievable result came in 1985 when an unknown 17-year old German by name Boris Becker burst on the scene defeating Kevin Curren in the Wimbledon final. Becker defended his title in 1986, but was at the receiving end when Stefan Edberg won his first title in 1988 with an exceptional display of serve and volley tennis. Becker and Edberg won the Wimbledon titles in 1989 and 1990, but the signs were clear that their hold on the sport was coming to an end. Sampras, Agassi and Jim Courier were three very different players from the same country. While Sampras boasted an excellent serve and volley game, Agassi and Courier surprisingly possessed a strong baseline game, mostly a feature of clay-court specialists.

The 1993 Wimbledon is fresh in memory as it serves as a perfect example to illustrate the change of guard at the top of tennis. Becker met Sampras in one semi-final and Courier played Edberg in the other. Courier had won the Australian Open and made the finals of the French losing to Sergi Bruguera. Edberg, on the other hand, had a couple of lean years by his standards but was still expected to reach his fourth final. Another Becker-Edberg classic was on the cards, but in what followed, Sampras and Courier dethroned the greats, and ushered in a new era. Sampras went on to win Wimbledon and the US Open in 1993 and added to his Wimbledon count in the next three years. Becker and Edberg quietly faded away although the former won the Australian in 1995 and made the finals of Wimbledon in the same year, losing to Sampras. The giant Dutchman Richard Krajicek stunned the world by defeating Sampras in the quarter-final in Wimbledon 1996 but normal service resumed soon with Agassi also back to winning ways. Sampras won the next four Wimbledon titles, but never quite conquered clay. In Wimbledon 2001, 19-year old Roger Federer from Switzerland eliminated Sampras in a five-set thriller in the fourth round. His sublime groundstrokes and quicksilver footwork were soon to dominate the tour. Infact Federer's 237 consecutive weeks at No.1 is an aberration when the rankings are closely observed. Federer dominated the game between 2004 and 2007 winning 11 out of 16 possible titles. But then, just as people thought he would go on to win everything in sight for the next few years, out came Rafael Nadal, who till then had dominated Federer in clay-court exchanges but never on other surfaces. With his heavy top-spin game and extraordinary physical strength, he destroyed Federer in the French final in 2008, and soon after, triumphed in one of the finest matches in the Wimbledon final. Between 2008 and 2011, the pair won 10 out of 12 titles with Djokovic and Juan Martin Del Potro winning the other two. Djokovic's wins over Federer in the US open in 2010 and the Australian Open in 2011 were shocks, but served notice to the top two that it was no more a two-horse race. The results were sudden but the progress never in doubt. As in many previous cases, the ascent of Djokovic has again reinforced my view that tennis (especially men's tennis) has an everlasting charm that can be attributed as much to the unique pattern of rise and dominance of players as to the skills of those involved..

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

The beautiful games



Hey guys

After numerous posts obsessed with cricket, it is time to turn to one related to two of my favourite sports. Football and Tennis are two of the most beautiful games to watch and are among my biggest crazes. Here is a crossword purely on these two games ranging from the World Cup to the leagues in Europe, Wimbledon and other opens. Time for Kick off guys, good luck!


** There are spaces between the first and last name

Across

1. Home country of the only player to win the Champions League with three different clubs (7)----- clarence seedorf
5. Tournament referee at Wimbledon from 1982 to 2005 (4,5)----- alan mills
7. Took out Hingis in first round of Wimbledon 99 (6, 5)------ jelena dokic
9. Total football with Cruyff at Ajax (5, 7)----- rinus michels
10. Pistol Pete's final defeat in Wimbledon (6, 5)-------- george bastl
12. Cause for Sampras' tears against Courier in 1995 Australian Open (3, 9)--- tim gullikson
14. Runner-up when Navratilova won her final Wimbledon singles title (4, 8)--- zina garrison jackson
15. Easy final for Andre Agassi down under in 2003 (6, 9)------- rainer schuttler
17. Led Bulgaria in shock upset of Germany in 1994 WC (9)------hristo stoichkov
18. French manager in 1998 WC (4, 7)---- aime jacquet
19. Handed Steffi Graf a 6-0 6-1 defeat in Berlin (6, 7)-------amanda coetzer
20. Shock death on field (Cameroon and West Ham)(4, 6, 3)----- marc vivien foe


Down

2. Hit crossbar with free kick in 2002 final (8)---- oliver neuville
3. 'White Pele' (4)----zico
4. Bust up with Keane led to the latter missing WC 2002 (4, 8)---- mick mccarthy
6. Doubles partner of the player who was blanked by Graf 6-0 6-0 in the Roland Garros final 1988 (4, 9)------- gigi fernandez
8. Would have been a footballing great if not for Munich (6, 7)----- duncan edwards
11. Scored both goals against Croatia in 1998 semi-final (6, 6)---- lilian thuram
13. Partnered Puskas in legendary Hungary side of 1954 (6, 6)---- sandor kocsis
16. Upset Graf to win 1992 Olympic Gold (8)---- jennifer capriati

Saturday, May 14, 2011

It's all in the genes

Hey guys and mostly this time gals..

Another crossword and this time on another of my favourite topics.. genetics- endlessly fascinating and most interesting..do give it a shot and lemme know how it is..



Across

2. mutation in gene on X chromosome (muscular degeneration)-- (10)
3. widely used organism in genetic analysis -- (10)
4. Ethically prohibited form of gene therapy -- (8)
5. prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal disorders -- (13)
6. Hairy pinna(Y chromosome) -- (14)
8. Abbreviation for an autosomal recessive disorder (leads to progressive mental retardation) --(3)
10. In RNA but not in DNA --(6)
14. Process to generate multiple copies of a DNA sequence --(3)
16. Rna to dna synthesis in retroviruses --(7,13)
18. Observable traits, characteristics or behaviour of an organism-- (9)
19. Missed the Nobel for DNA structure --(8)


Down

1. Gene with the potential to cause cancer --(8)
5. DNA Fingerprinting --(4,8)
7. Non-identical twins --(9)
9. XXY --(11)
11. Trisomy 21 --(4,8)
12. Lab where Watson and Crick discovered the double helix structure --(9)
13. DNA->mRNA->Protein --(7,5)
15. Human cloning, really?? -- (7)
17. Controls cell division --(8)


Answer key

Across

2. mutation in gene on X chromosome (muscular degeneration)-- dystrophin
3. widely used organism in genetic analysis -- drosophila
4. Ethically prohibited form of gene therapy -- germ line
5. prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal disorders -- amniocentesis
6. Hairy pinna(Y chromosome) -- hypertrichosis
8. Abbreviation for an autosomal recessive disorder (leads to progressive mental retardation) -- PKU
10. In RNA but not in DNA -- Uracil
14. Process to generate multiple copies of a DNA sequence -- PCR
16. Rna to dna synthesis in retroviruses -- Reverse Transcriptase
18. Observable traits, characteristics or behaviour of an organism-- phenotype
19. Missed the Nobel for DNA structure -- rosalind franklin


Down

1. Gene with the potential to cause cancer -- oncogene
5. DNA Fingerprinting -- alec jeffreys
7. Non-identical twins -- dizygotic
9. XXY -- Klinefelter syndrome
11. Trisomy 21 -- down syndrome
12. Lab where Watson and Crick discovered the double helix structure -- Cavendish
13. DNA->mRNA->Protein --central dogma
15. Human cloning, really?? -- Clonaid
17. Controls cell division -- telomere

Friday, May 13, 2011

crossword 1 answers

Hey guys

hope you had a fun time with the sports crossword

Here are the answers

Across

1. KING tells the umpire not to stop the bowler from bowling bouncers-- Len Pascoe

3. United played them before the Munich crash-- Red Star Belgrade

4. Batsman, journalist, 346 with the Don-- Jack Fingleton

7. Obstructing the field on 99-- Rameez Raja

9. Off the pitch like a crack of doom-- Mohammad Nissar

11. Arguably the greatest fielder ever...(pre Jonty Rhodes)-- Colin Bland

13. Fastest to 200 wickets in Tests-- Clarrie Grimmett

14. Agassi's grand slam completed-- Andre Medvedev

15. first minute goal in 1974 WC final-- Van Neeskens

17. Five goals in a WC game in 1994-- Oleg Salenko

19. Bradman battered, bruised and embarrassed in First Class match-- Eddie Gilbert

20. Can United score? They always do-- Clive Tyldesley (commentator on ITV4)



Down

2. only player to beat rank 1,2 and 3 enroute to title-- Steffi Graf French Open 99

5. Awarded MOM to Nawaz in 1975 WC game without knowing which team won-- Tom Graveney

6. two twin tons in a series-- Clyde Walcott

8. 1993 US and 1997 Wimby final. Both times fell to Pete-- Cedric Pioline

10. 40 wickets in a series...twice-- Terry Alderman

12. Wrong end of a Colin Croft bump-- Fred Goodall

16. Common to Ramsey, Busby and Fergie-- Scotland

18. 4 wickets out of 5 on debut against WI in Delhi-- Arshad Ayub

Next one coming up today on another of my pet topics...

Friday, May 6, 2011

Cross the line..

Hey guys... a first of a few crosswords I wanna put up over the next few weeks. As expected, I start with a sports based one before heading to other stuff. The clues are below the image. Good luck with it and let me know how the standard of questions is.

You can click on the image and open it in another tab before trying it out.

You can either send in your answers in the comments section or better still mail me at madhusudhanramakrishnan@gmail.com




Across

1. KING tells the umpire not to stop the bowler from bowling bouncers (6)

3. United played them before the Munich crash (8)

4. Batsman, journalist, 346 with the Don (9)

7. Obstructing the field on 99 (6,4)

9. Off the pitch like a crack of doom (6)

11. Arguably the greatest fielder ever...(pre Jonty Rhodes)-- (5,5)

13. Fastest to 200 wickets in Tests (8)

14. Agassi's grand slam completed (8)

15. first minute goal in 1974 WC final (8)

17. Five goals in a WC game in 1994 (4,7)

19. Bradman battered, bruised and embarrassed in First Class match (5,7)

20. Can United score? They always do (9)



Down

2. only player to beat rank 1,2 and 3 enroute to title (6,4)

5. Awarded MOM to Nawaz in 1975 WC game without knowing which team won (8)

6. two twin tons in a series (7)

8. 1993 US and 1997 Wimby final. Both times fell to Pete (7)

10. 40 wickets in a series...twice (8)

12. Wrong end of a Colin Croft bump (4,7)

16. Common to Ramsey, Busby and Fergie (8)

18. 4 wickets out of 5 on debut against WI in Delhi (4)

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

Move over Richie, the clowns are here!

For cricket fans used to the joy of watching quality cricket shows and listening to excellent analysis and commentary on Channel Nine and Sky broadcasts, the IPL coverage will indeed come as a shocking aberration. Undoubtedly, the overall standard of cricket coverage has dropped in the last ten years. This is mostly due to a spurt in the number of ex-cricketers and so-called cricket show anchors (read models, VJs etc). Admittedly the lady hosts are hot, but I cannot fathom the need for these skimpily clad girls to step up and enlighten the world with their extraordinary cricket 'acumen'. They might just as well cavort in the stands or somewhere outside which will at least regale viewers who are least interested in listening to the nonsensical conversations in the studio.

Because I run the risk of being branded sexist or chauvinistic, I hereby start with a disclaimer. There are quite a few girls/ladies who are knowledgeable about the game and are definitely not the ones I am referring to in this piece. I am in fact fortunate to know many of them. I also am not critical of the ones who do not like sports. After all it is their choice. It is the ones in between who do not quite know which way to go. They have boyfriends who love sports or claim to. Hence the girls decide it is best to demonstrate interest in the same lest they end up being left out of the groups. A classic example of the same is when i notice scores of girls in sports bars clueless while watching a Manchester United football game. Now do these girls care to know about the legacy of the club or its rich past. Do they have the slightest idea about the great trio, the Munich disaster or Nou Camp 1999. I bet not. Why then turn up there and stare at the screen? The reason a comedy show like the IPL is successful is because it is targeted at such a population. They don't know much, don't care to know much, don't appreciate the finer aspects and have only a faint idea about the game in general.

I have had enough of listening to these pretentious girls talk about Nadal's posterior and Federer's cut looks. Instead of appreciating the fantastic rivalry and the nature of the contests, they reduce the sport to such a meaningless concept. Messi's hair, Ronaldo's relationships take precedence over their skills and the history of the El Clasico. Well, the IPL is after all bloody entertainment and nothing else. So I can't really expect the brilliance of Test Match Special analysis there. But then the ones who are responsible should realise the fact that the game is being corrupted and adulterated with these ignoramuses trying to pass off as experts. Why on earth did cricket have to get to all this?

I don't think the ones i spoke about are going to ever know the history, listen to Benaud wax lyrical about Holding's silky action or appreciate classic Test match finishes. Neither are these 'smart' girls (lots of guys also fall in this category) going to understand, analyse and appreciate the nuances of football and tennis. But I hope this piece does hammer a fact into these girls' heads. We guys may ogle and think about girls more often than not BUT when it comes to sports and related discussions, we clearly prefer intelligent analysis to shameless exposure and ignorant opinions.