Friday, May 6, 2011

Cross the line..

Hey guys... a first of a few crosswords I wanna put up over the next few weeks. As expected, I start with a sports based one before heading to other stuff. The clues are below the image. Good luck with it and let me know how the standard of questions is.

You can click on the image and open it in another tab before trying it out.

You can either send in your answers in the comments section or better still mail me at madhusudhanramakrishnan@gmail.com




Across

1. KING tells the umpire not to stop the bowler from bowling bouncers (6)

3. United played them before the Munich crash (8)

4. Batsman, journalist, 346 with the Don (9)

7. Obstructing the field on 99 (6,4)

9. Off the pitch like a crack of doom (6)

11. Arguably the greatest fielder ever...(pre Jonty Rhodes)-- (5,5)

13. Fastest to 200 wickets in Tests (8)

14. Agassi's grand slam completed (8)

15. first minute goal in 1974 WC final (8)

17. Five goals in a WC game in 1994 (4,7)

19. Bradman battered, bruised and embarrassed in First Class match (5,7)

20. Can United score? They always do (9)



Down

2. only player to beat rank 1,2 and 3 enroute to title (6,4)

5. Awarded MOM to Nawaz in 1975 WC game without knowing which team won (8)

6. two twin tons in a series (7)

8. 1993 US and 1997 Wimby final. Both times fell to Pete (7)

10. 40 wickets in a series...twice (8)

12. Wrong end of a Colin Croft bump (4,7)

16. Common to Ramsey, Busby and Fergie (8)

18. 4 wickets out of 5 on debut against WI in Delhi (4)

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

Move over Richie, the clowns are here!

For cricket fans used to the joy of watching quality cricket shows and listening to excellent analysis and commentary on Channel Nine and Sky broadcasts, the IPL coverage will indeed come as a shocking aberration. Undoubtedly, the overall standard of cricket coverage has dropped in the last ten years. This is mostly due to a spurt in the number of ex-cricketers and so-called cricket show anchors (read models, VJs etc). Admittedly the lady hosts are hot, but I cannot fathom the need for these skimpily clad girls to step up and enlighten the world with their extraordinary cricket 'acumen'. They might just as well cavort in the stands or somewhere outside which will at least regale viewers who are least interested in listening to the nonsensical conversations in the studio.

Because I run the risk of being branded sexist or chauvinistic, I hereby start with a disclaimer. There are quite a few girls/ladies who are knowledgeable about the game and are definitely not the ones I am referring to in this piece. I am in fact fortunate to know many of them. I also am not critical of the ones who do not like sports. After all it is their choice. It is the ones in between who do not quite know which way to go. They have boyfriends who love sports or claim to. Hence the girls decide it is best to demonstrate interest in the same lest they end up being left out of the groups. A classic example of the same is when i notice scores of girls in sports bars clueless while watching a Manchester United football game. Now do these girls care to know about the legacy of the club or its rich past. Do they have the slightest idea about the great trio, the Munich disaster or Nou Camp 1999. I bet not. Why then turn up there and stare at the screen? The reason a comedy show like the IPL is successful is because it is targeted at such a population. They don't know much, don't care to know much, don't appreciate the finer aspects and have only a faint idea about the game in general.

I have had enough of listening to these pretentious girls talk about Nadal's posterior and Federer's cut looks. Instead of appreciating the fantastic rivalry and the nature of the contests, they reduce the sport to such a meaningless concept. Messi's hair, Ronaldo's relationships take precedence over their skills and the history of the El Clasico. Well, the IPL is after all bloody entertainment and nothing else. So I can't really expect the brilliance of Test Match Special analysis there. But then the ones who are responsible should realise the fact that the game is being corrupted and adulterated with these ignoramuses trying to pass off as experts. Why on earth did cricket have to get to all this?

I don't think the ones i spoke about are going to ever know the history, listen to Benaud wax lyrical about Holding's silky action or appreciate classic Test match finishes. Neither are these 'smart' girls (lots of guys also fall in this category) going to understand, analyse and appreciate the nuances of football and tennis. But I hope this piece does hammer a fact into these girls' heads. We guys may ogle and think about girls more often than not BUT when it comes to sports and related discussions, we clearly prefer intelligent analysis to shameless exposure and ignorant opinions.

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

The Don's Achilles heel??



It would be sacrilegious to even consider comparing any batsman with Don Bradman. He is so far ahead of the rest of the pack that it defies logic. It is fair to say that no sport has witnessed such an extraordinary domination by one player. Bradman made tons of runs, scored them remarkably quickly, was involved in numerous record partnerships and averaged near 100 which is astounding. Before I go further, let me summarise a few of Bradman's outstanding records that are unlikely to be matched, let along bettered.

1. 29 centuries in just 52 matches (80 innings)- 1 hundred per 2.75 innings. Headley comes close with one every four innings (10 in 40).

2. Bradman scored 974 runs in a single series in 1929-30 against England. The closest is Hammond's 905 in the 1928-29 series.

3. His lowest average in a series was 55 in the Bodyline series and that was considered a failure.

4. He was one of the quickest scorers and scored 300 runs in a day.

5. In 1936-37, he scored 270, 169 and 212 as Australia fought back to win the series 3-2 after being 2-0 down.

6. His average is first class cricket is over 95 with 117 centuries in around 234 games. Merchant and Headley average nearly 70 (next best)!!

7. Has a 400 and 300+ stand with Bill Ponsford and a 346 run stand with Jack Fingleton.

8. Lost six of his best years to the World War. You can only imagine what his record might have been otherwise.

9. Led his team called the 'Invincibles' in 1948 to England. Did not lose a single game. Australia piled up 700 in a day against Essex.

10. Scored a century as Australia chased down 404 (then a record chase in Tests)

Ok. before you start thinking what is the objective of my piece, let me tell you that analysing stats is useless unless the context is considered.

As an example, I read CLR James' classic 'Beyond a Boundary'- a highly recommended read. In that book and a couple of others, I came across the point that Bradman was the prime example of a batsman who feasted on bowling in good conditions (read flat tracks) but struggled on the really tough ones (sticky/wet wickets). While it is not possible to establish the nature of the wickets without actually seeing them, I have jus done a brief analysis of how Bradman fared in matches where the team posted less than 300. As it turns out, in 22 such innings, he averages just over 28 with 2 centuries, a far cry from his astronomical career numbers. There can be arguments about how other batsmen failed and the reverse logic of the team failing when he failed. Hobbs and Headley were thought of as better players in tougher conditions and I shall try to establish this with some analysis soon. But at the moment, can I dare suppose that this can be considered the 'Achilles Heel' of the great Don??

Bradman in innings where the team total has been less than 300

43 and 0: vs West Indies

13: vs India

2: vs South Africa

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rest vs England

1 and 18

8

0 and 103*

8 and 66

24

71

36 and 13

38 and 0

0

26

103

12

7

Total = 592 in 21 (22 innings and 1 n.o)

Average of 28.2 in innings where Aussies were dismissed for less than 300 shows that he scored when it was lot easier and did struggle when the going was tough.

In a similar context (team scores less than 300), George Headley scored 817 runs at an average of nearly 38 with four centuries. He wasn't known as the 'Black Bradman' for nothing. Hobbs (of 199 FC centuries fame) scored 1639 runs in a similar context at an average of close to 40. I am not sure if this is enough to pass a judgment. That is not my intention anyway, but just an example to show that career figures of any batsman/bowler must be broken down and analysed in greater detail before coming to a conclusion.

Case in point are the stats of Sunny Gavaskar against WI- 12 of his 34 hundreds against them. In matches when Holding/Marshall did not play, he had 6 hundreds at an average over 91. In games they played, he averaged 41. But even the 41 is bloated, because in 20 innings, he scored a 236* and 147* in dead draws. He scored 594 runs in 4 innings and just 151 in the remaining 16 at an average less than 10 and did not pass 20 even once in the 7 innings he was dismissed by Marshall between 1982-83 and 1983-84.

Thursday, April 7, 2011

Ace of Pace

For almost every Test cricket fan, nothing symbolises quality Test cricket than the sight of a superb fast bowler steaming in with the new ball to dislodge a top batsman. It surely can't get better than this! I have grown up in the 1990s watching and admiring brilliant line and length bowlers like Curtly Ambrose and Courtney Walsh, the quick Allan Donald and the talented Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis. Despite having missed the action in the previous decades which witnessed the best of West Indian fast bowling and the aggression of Dennis Lillee and Jeff Thomson, I have managed to catch the best matches and moments on video. Comparing fast bowlers is as old a debate as the one on who the best batsman is. Intrigued as I have been by this debate, I decided to analyse the great fast bowlers statistically to try and come up with the answer to the big question- Who is the greatest of them all?

Firstly, I decided to consider only the top fast bowlers from each team (only post World War 2 bowlers considered due to similarity of conditions). The criteria for shortlisting the bowlers is purely the bowling average and strike rate after considering all bowlers with a minimum haul of 200 wickets. Here is the distribution.

Format-> Bowler (wickets)

1. Australia- Ray Lindwall (228), Dennis Lillee (355), Glenn McGrath (563)
2. England- Fred Truman (302), Ian Botham (383), Bob Willis (325)
3. India- Kapil Dev (434)
4. New Zealand- Richard Hadlee (431)
5. Pakistan- Imran Khan (362), Wasim Akram (414), Waqar Younis (373)
6. South Africa- Allan Donald (330), Shaun Pollock (421), Dale Steyn (238)
7. Sri Lanka- Chaminda Vaas (355)
8. West Indies -Malcolm Marshall (376), Curtly Ambrose (405), Michael Holding (249),Joel Garner (259)

There can be several books written about the fantastic exploits of these legends, but I shall restrict myself to the task of explaining the various parameters I have used in the analysis.

Although most parameters are self explanatory, I shall provide a brief idea about each of them.

The main factor used in all calculations is the quality factor which is the product of the strike rate and the bowling average. The lower the value, the better the bowler's performance. In all factors, the highest score is used as the base and the other numbers are normalised.

1. factor 1: Overall career quality factor (bowling average and strike rate)
Dale Steyn, by virtue of his outstanding strike rate is on top while Marshall's average of 20.94 brings him second.

2. factor 2: five wicket hauls: Innings per five wicket haul is used to measure the bowler's match-winning ability.
Richard Hadlee is on top followed by Steyn.

3. factor 3: performance in wins: the quality factor is measured in wins.
Once again, Hadlee and Steyn are on top.

4. factor 4: Away performance: accords bonus to bowler if more than 50% of his wickets are in away Tests and measures quality factor in away wins.
Michael Holding and Marshall are on top. Note that Dennis Lillee loses out as a result of not playing many Tests outside Australia and England.

5. factor 5: top-order wickets: percentage of top-order wickets. Vaas and Pollock are slightly ahead of the rest of the pack.

6. factor 6- 3rd and 4th innings performance- measures quality factor in the vital phase of Tests.Marshall and Donald are on top.

7. factor 7- performance w.r.t peers: complex factor which measures quality of peers both in the same team and other teams. Care is taken to ensure that a bowler does not gain significantly if he has played in a weak team (eg Hadlee).
Steyn and Trueman come out on top.

8. factor 8: Performance against the best teams (3 or 4 at most)- Marshall and Trueman are on top.

9. factor 9: Performance in tough bowling conditions: batting average in the period is used to measure which conditions have been the best for batsmen i.e. toughest for bowlers. Bowler stats in these countries is used to calculate this factor.
Marshall and Steyn are on top. Lillee loses out again as a result of poor performances in the few matches he played outside Australia and England.

10. factor 10: best years- The best years (4/5) of the bowler are used to calculate this factor so that the peak performance can be compared.
Imran Khan and Waqar Younis are on top.

Bonus points are given to allrounders who have contributed to Test wins in the batting department too.



Finally, when the results are checked, Malcolm Marshall comes out on top and deservedly so. He performed superbly and was the best of the Wi pacemen. He also impressed in India and Pakistan which were regarded as graveyards for fast bowlers. Steyn comes a very close second by virtue of a stunning start to his career. It will be interesting to see if he can maintain this for the next five years. The next five are Hadlee, Imran, Waqar, Donald and Ambrose. It's highly unlikely that anyone will have complaints about the rankings of these greats. McGrath, Akram and Lillee come within the top 15. The last few positions belong to Botham, Kapil Dev and Vaas, who despite s rich haul of wickets, were definitely not as potent and threatening in all conditions as the bowlers in the top five.

It was an enthralling exercise to go through the amazing stats of these legendary pace bowlers and an even more interesting exercise to work out the parameters. Now all I want to do is get my hands on a collection of DVDs where I can watch some classic fast bowling, which is truly the most endearing aspect of Test cricket.

Monday, February 28, 2011

Crazy, whacko, out of my mind! take ur pick..love those acts of mine though :D

It's a no-brainer to realize by now that I am a sports nut and especially a huge cricket nut. But most people would be unaware (and might as well stay that way) of the insane things I used to indulge in during my high school and college days when it came to sports. Those days and acts of mine still bring a smile instantly and undoubtedly form a major part of the stories I will narrate in the future..and ya i would not mind if people consider me a weirdo after reading all this..my AIM is that people should understand they have just spoken/met one of the biggest, most passionate and craziest of sports fans. Here's a short list of my acts- some laughable, some embarrassing and some rather atrocious :)

I'll start with the worst ones and get better...

1. Railway station, who cares?-- On numerous occasions when we had to go to the station to pick up cousins and relatives, I always carried a tennis ball. My parents were worried what people looking at me practicing inswingers and leg spin on the platform would think. Little did i care..if there was a ball it was better, else i would still imagine an Imran bowling to Viv and feel bliss..

2. Benaud of Bangalore- if i couldn't bowl at home lest i break some glass, i would turn Benaud/Lawry/Greig all rolled into one..mock Test matches and contests were described with some finesse..add to it imitation of batting and bowling actions and one wouldn't be blamed for assuming something was not right with me..

3. Wimbledon has moved?- how about running Grand Slams in parallel at home?..simulating the matches starting from the first round and five set matches pitting the top seeds against each other. It wasn't always easy to get Edberg's volleys and Sampras' serve right with a table tennis bat and ball..but I did a fair job..frankly this helped me the most when I actually tried playing tennis much much later.

4. exams can take a hike- inevitably the best matches take place mostly during exams. 7th exams- Wc 1996, luckily 10th exams just before WC 1999, but 12th not so lucky- 2001- India Aus- VVS :), engineering almost always had a great series/matches on including the Football WC 2002. Care to take a guess what choice I made..no way could i have given lesser importance to exams than i did those days...

5. poster quizzes- a humongous collection of Sportstars and Wisdens which is still somewhere in my attic, to go with a superb poster collection. I stuck 100s of them in my room to completely cover the walls and the ceiling..only for my mom to pull them down for repainting the house :(. those lovely days when i used to play quizzes for the posters with Raghu and Navneet will stay forever in my mind.

6. Test cricket at 6am is on no matter what- I can take credit for coming up with a fantastic idea to play Test cricket instead of slam-bang stuff. With all rules including lbw, we played some amazing Test cricket from 6-6:30 in the morning all the way till afternoon. The Rajkumar kidnap period in 2000 gave us the best possible chance to play everyday and play we did!!. that phase of my life will remain up there when i finally look back at top moments that i savour..

7. SCG the better drainage system..no way guys!- on numerous occasions, Bangalore's weather created problems for the cricket on weekends. I would return on some days at about 2 or 3am after hanging out with college pals, and then after just 3-4 hours of sleep, would head off to the ground to set it right for play. no super soppers available, so what? Trash rollers were clearly a good replacement. Hari would be the only guy to wake up at 6:30 and help me. The rollers would be used all over the pitch and laying area so as to even the surface and dry it. After about two hours, when the other lazy idiots turned up, the pitch would be perfect to play with just enough moisture for some movement :D...haha!

8. Indispensable? maybe not..but close enough- When I was away in the US, no cricket was played in Bangalore. The day i returned, after few calls, there were 28 guys ready in the ground for some serious Test cricket. I did the same in the US too- organizing a match by making calls to seniors/juniors all through weekends..sometimes I had no time for a shower on sat/sun with innumerable calls coming in to inquire about the prospects of play. Once, I even called people from the airport and got them to the ground to play a match in which I was not gonna play. :D

Ultimately though, my absence in Bangalore led to the beloved ground being converted into a park. Whenever I pass that place, my eyes go moist and I recall those lovely days of cricket and in general those times when the innocent love for all things sport superseded most other trivial pursuits in life (read studies/career etc). My passion for the game and crazy actions at various points might have made it hard to digest for people watching, but little did I care. Even today, nothing gives me more satisfaction than practicing a Michael Holding run up and a Richards flick in the middle of the road:D

Sunday, February 27, 2011

The best since Edgbaston!

I shudder to think that I almost managed to miss this match! The venue shift from Kolkata had ensured that the number of tickets available to the public in Bangalore was far fewer than usual and the struggle that ensued on February 24th when tickets were sold was extraordinary. Being used to easy access to tickets and passes, I braced myself for a whole new experience at the stadium few days before the game. We spent a sleepless night witnessing violent crowd behaviour, a police lathi-charge and continuous chaos before finally managing to get just two tickets. The number of tickets sold was less than half of what had been advertised. Following a heavy criticism of their high-handedness, the KSCA decided to release a few more tickets online. I managed to purchase two more tickets after receiving useful information about the online sale of tickets. I was fortunate because the entire quota of online tickets was exhausted in less than an half hour.

Finally, on the big day, we reached the ground about five hours before the start only to find nearly 150 people queued up already at the gates. The intensive security measures ensured that we could not carry any food or water inside the ground. Haphazard seat allocation procedures meant that nobody quite knew where they were supposed to be seated. But eventually, all I cared about was watching the game, and with a great group of cricket crazy fans, it was undoubtedly going to be a day to remember. None of us, however, had the faintest idea of what was about to transpire in the next few hours.

India won the toss and batted. Most of us realised that this was a major factor considering the strength of the batting lineup and the presence of two spinners. A frenetic start where Virender Sehwag had three lives in five balls left us gasping. Sachin Tendulkar played another of his superb ODI knocks, mixing aggression with sound placement. Crucially though, India lost far too many wickets in the end overs and finished about 15-20 runs short of what they should have got after the excellent platform they had. Being dismissed one ball short of the 50 overs is not a bad thing usually, but as we were to realise, on this flat track, every run, including the single the last pair failed to complete, was going to be vital. The Bangalore crowd, already known for its vociferous support, only got louder as the innings progressed and the raucous cheers that went up when Tendulkar reached his century were mind numbing to say the least.

While 339 seemed unassailable, I was not quite confident. The track had absolutely nothing for the bowlers, and if the batsmen had a good outing, the chase was very much on. Andrew Strauss and Kevin Pietersen started like a train, and to most avid watchers, it all seemed like the blistering start the Pakistan openers had given in the 1996 quarter-final. Munaf Patel, not generally known for his fielding, demonstrated stunning reflexes and managed to latch on to a return catch offered by Pietersen. The crowd was roaring and when Jonathan Trott was dismissed soon after, it seemed like curtails for England. A hugely controversial moment followed when Ian Bell was reprieved after being struck palpably in front. The rule stated that in the event the ball strikes the pad at a distance greater than 2.5 metres from the stumps, the decision would stick with the on field call. The technicality of the UDRS had saved Bell and the displeasure in the crowd was immense. Loud chants of “cheating” and other expletives were heard for a while, and at about the 40 over mark, England seemed to well and truly have the match wrapped up.

Strauss’ century was the highest score by an England batsman and one of the finest in an ODI chase. MS Dhoni’s defensive tactics were not going to bring any success and it seemed very obvious that for India to have a chance, England had to mess up. The decision to take the batting powerplay immediately paid dividends when Bell was caught trying to go over the top. Zaheer Khan’s searing yorker nailed Strauss the very next ball and the stadium went wild. Chairs were being thrown, people fell on top of one another and few others even ripped their shirts off in Sourav Ganguly style. With two more wickets falling quickly, it seemed as if England had succumbed to the pressure exerted by the crowd and the bowling. 29 runs required off two overs. India surely could not lose. Enter Swann and Bresnan. They took 15 runs of the hapless Piyush Chawla, setting up a fantastic final over. With 11 runs required off four balls, Ahmed Shahzad deposited a half-volley from Munaf Patel for a six over long on. The crowd could not bear to watch and suddenly a tie seemed a possibility. The improbable came true when, with two needed off the last ball, Swann drove to the covers. The ball was somehow fielded and one of the greatest matches in World Cup history had come to the most amazing of ends and need I say I was privileged to be present for this one. Once again, it is impossible to believe I almost missed this game!

Friday, January 14, 2011

Caribbean Cruise

It is ironical that I am attempting to write about the glorious history of West Indian cricket when it is at its nadir. The sad state of affairs is palpable and the administrators and players are guilty of doing nothing to alleviate the situation. But then it is also apt, as it reminds one and all about their extraordinary contribution to world cricket. No other team has managed to produce as many naturally gifted batsmen, outstanding fast bowlers and brilliant all-round fieldsmen like the West Indies have. While selecting the all time XI of the West Indies, people are in a complete quandary considering there are at least 25-30 top players to pick from. Richie Benaud, the doyen of commentators, himself calls them 'The True Entertainers' of cricket and I cannot help but agree. I have grown up watching and reading about the fantastic exploits of West Indian legends and this work is the smallest tribute I can pay to a team cherished by every cricket lover.

West Indian cricket has seen many highs and lows, exceptional captains and dominant players. It can be divided into different periods detailed below.

1. The Headley years

Cricket was given to almost every country by England during the course of its imperialistic conquests. West Indies made their entry into international cricket in 1928. The islands of the West Indies did not have a fair representation in those early years though. Majority of the players in the team were whites and very few locals were preferred. Learie Constantine was an outstanding all-rounder who played in his country's first Test match. The tour of England under Karl Nunes turned out to be a disaster though, as the team went down by an innings in all three matches. But in 1929-30, when England toured the West Indies, a new batting star was born. George Headley of Jamaica plundered the England attack and scored 703 runs in four Tests including four centuries as West Indies won their first ever Test at Georgetown.

After a couple of disappointing series, West Indies won their first ever series against England in 1934-35. A loss in a low scoring first Test was followed by an outstanding performance by Headley, who by then was known as the 'Black Bradman'. He scored 485 runs including a superb 270 in the final Test at Kingston where England were beaten by an innings. Headley's record before the World War was simply outstanding. He scored almost 26% of the team runs during the period and averaged more than 66. He finished his career after the war with 10 centuries in 40 innings, a rate second only to Bradman's. He also averaged 71 at number three which remains one of the best for that position.



Centre:George Headley, the first great WI batsman

2. Era of the 3 W's

England toured the Caribbean in 1947-48. George Headley led the West Indies in the first Test at Barbados becoming the first black captain to do so. But he was immediately replaced in the next match by Gerry Gomez. Frank Worrell, Clyde Walcott and Everton Weekes made their debuts in this series. Known as the 3 W's, all three were born in Bridgetown and soon became the batting heavyweights of the team. West Indies went on to win the series 2-0 and on the next tour of India, Everton Weekes set a record for the most consecutive centuries when he scored five hundreds in five innings and was run out for 90 in the sixth. West Indies dominated the 1950 series against England winning 3-1 with Worrell leading the scoring. He aggregated 539 runs at nearly 90 with a top score of 261 at Nottingham.

Australia won the series down under in 1951-52 by a comprehensive margin of 4-1 but the series was a lot closer than that. The Aussies won the first Test by three wickets and the fourth by just one wicket. Despite the excellent individual performances, West Indies were not able to establish dominance. This was in part, due to the absence of a local captain. The 1955 Australian tour of West Indies saw the home team losing heavily with the Aussie batsmen feasting on some weak bowling. Clyde Walcott though was in superb batting form scoring 827 runs with five centuries in the series, including a century in both innings on two different occasions in the same series.





Left:The three greats from Barbados: Worrell, Walcott and Weekes
Right: Meckiff is run out by Joe Solomon's direct hit as the Brisbane Test is tied


3. Rise of the greatest all-rounder- Sobers

The England tour of 1954 witnessed the debut of the 17 year old Garfield Sobers, who played in the lower middle order and bowled occasionally. He had not scored a single century despite getting numerous starts. On the disastrous England tour of 1957, when West Indies lost 3-0, Sobers was one of the few quality performers. Finally, in 1958 against Pakistan at Kingston, Sobers announced himself with a spectacular 365*, in the process surpassing Len Hutton's 20 year record. Conrad Hunte scored 260 and the West Indies amassed 790/3 beating Pakistan by an innings. This series was followed by a victory over India and a defeat to Pakistan and England. The next series was against Australia down under and was expected to be a no contest considering Australia were easily the best team.

4. Worrell's era

Frank Worrell became the first black captain of the West Indies and encouraged his team to play attacking cricket. He united all the islands and there was enormous respect for his leadership. Richie Benaud was the opposing captain and in the first Test at Brisbane, the West Indies were in trouble early losing three quick wickets. In the passage of play that ensued, Sobers and Worrell unleashed a scintillating array of strokes, with Sobers in particular dominating the Australian bowling. He scored a stunning 132 as West Indies made 453. Norman O'Neill made 181 as Australia secured a 52 run lead. Alan Davidson who had scored a half century earlier bowled superbly to keep the West Indies down to 284, with Worrell top scoring. Australia were expected to get the runs easily, but Wesley Hall's aggressive fast bowling left them in tatters at 92/6. Benaud and Davidson fought back and took Australia to 228 when Davidson was run out by Joe Solomon. When Hall started the last over of the match, all results were possible. Benaud was caught behind with five required putting West Indies on top. Then the drama started. Hall spilled an easy catch two balls later and when Wally Grout was run out going for the third run, the scores were level. Kline pushed the ball to square leg and set off for what would have been the winning run, but Solomon swooped and effected a stunning direct hit. The match had ended in a tie, the first ever in Test history and had set the precedent for a glorious summer. Australia and West Indies won the next two matches comfortably and when the fourth Test started in Adelaide, the series was level 1-1 with two to play. West Indies dominated the match, but Australia's last pair of Kline and Mackay frustrated them for almost two hours to draw the game. Australia won a tight contest at the MCG by two wickets to take the series 2-1. At the end of a fascinating series, Frank Worrell and his team were given a parade through Melbourne and the Australia-WI contest ever since is known as the frank Worrell trophy. Worrell's team comfortably defeated England and Australia over the next two years and Garry Sobers took over the captaincy in 1966 for the England tour of West Indies.

5. Sobers as captain and the decline

Sobers took over the captaincy from Worrell in 1966 and reestablished West Indian supremacy in his first two series as captain. In the ultimate all-round performance, he scored over 700 runs, picked up 20 wickets and held 10 catches against England in the 3-1 victory. The team though had lost much of its sheen and the bowling had gone rather weak. In what turned out to be a premature decision, he declared both innings of the Trinidad Test in 1967-68 setting England 215 to win which they managed to do with few balls to spare. He was vilified extensively for this blunder and despite his best efforts to win the next Test, England drew and won the series 1-0. Sobers did not win a single series after this. After the 1-0 loss to India in 1971, Rohan Kanhai took over the reins. A loss against Australia at home was followed by a 2-0 win in England with Sobers stroking a fantastic 150 at Lord's. Sobers announced his retirement in 1973 and the captaincy was taken over by Clive Lloyd for the tour of India. Lloyd's reign was the start of what would go onto become an unprecedented period of dominance over the next two decades.





Left:The greatest captain and motivator- Frank Worrell
Right:All rounder nonpareil-Garry Sobers


6.Pace is the key

The first Test at Bangalore on the 1974-75 tour of India witnessed the debuts of two players who would go on to become the most outstanding batsmen over the next fifteen years. Vivian Richards and Gordon Greenidge had contrasting debuts; while Richards made just 4 and 3, Greenidge scored 93 and 107. West Indies went on to win a close series 3-2. Lloyd's success continued in the first World Cup in 1975 when they won all their matches enroute to the title. They were lucky to win against Pakistan when they were down 166/8 and 203/9 chasing 267, but Andy Roberts and Deryck Murray put on 64 runs for the last wicket to clinch the win. In the final, Clive Lloyd smashed a brilliant 102, his century coming off just 82 balls to lead West Indies to a 17 run win. Australia's chase was thwarted by Richards who ran three batsmen out including the Chappell brothers. The tour of Australia in 1975-76 taught the West Indies some harsh truths about the game. The Aussies were the best side by a distance and in Dennis Lillee and Jeff Thomson, they had the best new ball pairing in the world. Max Walker and Gary Gilmour provided superb support and the tough cricket they played clearly hurt the West Indies. Roy Fredericks smashed the Aussie bowling around in his 169 in the 2nd Test at Perth, but the West Indies were routed 5-1. The only man to emerge with his head held high was Viv Richards, who after being promoted to open the innings made 98, 101 and 50 in the last two Tests. India toured the Caribbean later and squared the series by chasing down a then record 406. The West Indian spinners proved to be totally ineffective and Lloyd realized that the only way to batter teams into submission was to assemble an array of top fast bowlers. In Andy Roberts, Michael Holding, Joel Garner and Colin Croft, he had a terrifying set of fast bowlers who changed the way Test cricket would be played over the next decade.


7.The summer of 1976

>;Tony Greig's remark that he would make the West Indies 'grovel' turned out to be one of the biggest mistakes. The term had a racist connotation to it and nobody was angered more than Viv Richards, who took it upon himself to inflict all the suffering on the England bowlers that summer. Richards was in exceptional form scoring 829 runs in 4 Tests and might have gone on to touch 1000 runs had he not missed the second Test. In the Old Trafford Test, Brian Close and John Eldrich were subjected to a barrage of bouncers by the West Indian quicks. In the final Test at the batsman friendly Oval, Michael Holding produced a masterclass. After Richards' 291 had led WI to 687, England had managed 445 thanks mainly to Dennis Amiss who made 203. Holding produced a blistering spell of fast bowling picking up 8 wickets including the prized scalp of Tony Greig. Six more wickets in the second innings brought him match figures of 14/149, an amazing performance on a flat track. England were thrashed 3-0 and this began a period of unprecedented West Indian dominance over England. Richards went on to make 1710 runs in the calendar year, which remained a record for 30 years.







Top:Whispering death Michael Holding who destroyed England at the Oval with 14/149
Centre:Gundappa Viswanath's glorious 97 at Chepauk is one of the finest knocks played against WI
Right:The WI pace quartet- Roberts,Holding, Croft and Garner

8. Packer and beyond

Most players around the world had issues with their pay and when Kerry Packer of Channel 9 started World Series Cricket after discussions with Tony Greig and Ian Chappell, most West Indian players joined the fold. After two seasons of SuperTests and one-day games among the rebel teams, the boards accepted the demands and the players were back in the main team. During that period, a depleted West Indies lost
a Test in India. Lloyd's team embarked on a tour of New Zealand which turned out to be one of the most ill-tempered. In the first Test at Dunedin, the WI bowlers were incensed after a blatant caught behind decision was turned down. New Zealand squeezed a one wicket win and held on to win the acrimonious series 1-0. The series is sadly remembered for Michael Holding kicking the stumps down and Colin Croft barging into umpire Fred Goodall.


9.Lloyd's reign

Lloyd's powerful West Indian team drew 1-1 against Australia after a classic Kim Hughes century at the MCG enabled the Aussies to win a close game. India were beaten easily in the home series with Richards smashing an exceptional 61 off 36 balls to chase down 173 in 26 overs at Kingston. The WI went to England confident of lifting the trophy for the third consecutive time. An early setback against India was quickly forgotten as they went about their business clinically thrashing Australia by 101 runs, with Winston Davis picking up 7/51. India had a superb tournament and reached the final on June 25th at Lord's. It was a classic mismatch and despite India having tastes success against WI at Berbice earlier and in the World Cup, the Caribbeans were expected to cruise to victory. David Frith was so confident of India being humbled that he famously stated that he would "eat his words" if India won. When India were bundled out for just 183, everything seemed to be too easy for the champions. But when Greenidge forgot about the Lord's slope and was bowled by an innocuous Balwinder Sandhu delivery, the Indians were hopeful. Richards quickly proceeded to change the game with some terrific shots. He had seven fours in his 33 and looked like he would end the game within the next twenty overs. Then came the moment of truth! Richards played a pull off the hapless Madan Lal andjust when the ball seemed headed for safety, India's captain Kapil Dev ran more than twenty yards to pluck the catch. The tide had turned. India's medium pacers squeezed the WI batsmen and eventually won a shock victory by 43 runs. The WI were stunned and Lloyd was resolved to establish that India's victory was only an aberration.

In the series that followed in India, the WI definitely sought revenge for the defeat in the final at Lord's. India failed to win a single Test and were ruthlessly hunted down by the pace bowlers, Malcolm Marshall in particular. He picked up 33 wickets in the series with his best spell coming in Kanpur. On a flat and lifeless track, Marshall destroyed the Indian batting with a spell of 4 for 9 in eight overs and accounted for Sunil Gavaskar. At the peak of his bowling prowess, Marshall dominated Gavaskar dismissing him seven times below 20 runs. Gavaskar scored a scintillating century at Delhi and unbeaten 236 in Chennai coming in at No.4. Richards' famously remarked to Gavaskar, who came in at 0/2 "No matter when you come in, the score will be zero." India were thrashed 7-0 in the ODI series, the highlight being Richards' superb 149 off 99 balls at Jamshedpur. The result was truly a reflection of the greatness of the WI team and how far ahead of the pack they were.







Top:Infamous series in NZ- Holding kicks out following an umpiring howler
Centre:Lloyd introduces his team to the Queen
Right:Malcolm Marshall, the greatest fast bowler from the Caribbean


10.The blackwashes

WI secured an emphatic 3-0 win against Australia at home, not losing a single second innings wicket in three victories. WI then travelled to England, who they had dominated in recent series. But what transpired in the next five games was truly extraordinary. After an innings defeat at Edgbaston, England fought back at Lord's picking up a 41 run lead courtesy an 8 wicket haul by Ian Botham. David Gower declared at 300/9 setting WI an enormous task of chasing 342 in 75 overs. Gordon Greenidge however was in a belligerent mood and made a mockery of the target scoring 214 off 242 balls as WI chased the target down for the loss of just one wicket (a run-out)in just 66 overs. The WI comfortably won the next Test at Leeds after Marshall ripped through England with 7/53 despite a fracture in his left hand. A 5-0 thrashing was sealed at the Oval few days later and WI were firmly sitting on top of the tree.

WI also won the ODI series 2-1. The first ODI at Old Trafford witnessed a stupendous 189* by Viv Richards, which is by far the greatest ODI innings ever played. WI were reeling at 166/9 when Richards, on 95, was joined by Michael Holding. The last wicket stand was worth 106 with Richards contributing 94 of those runs. He cut loose on the England attack and hammered Willis, Pringle, Foster and Botham to all parts of the ground. Old Trafford had witnessed some of the cleanest striking of the cricket ball ever and his 189 out of a team 272 is still the highest contribution to a team's completed innings (total greater than 100 and overs greater than 25).

Lloyd retired at the end of the away series against Australia which WI won 3-1. Marshall was again the pick of the bowlers and was at his peak with 11 five wicket hauls in 14 matches. Richards took over the captaincy and led WI to a comfortable 2-0 win over New Zealand at home. The home series against England was another mauling for England. They were swamped 5-0 again with Richards scoring the fastest Test century at Antigua in a 240 run win.

11. The Richards' era

Viv Richards led WI with distinction after Lloyd's retirement, not losing a single series as captain. The only team that consistently challenged WI was Imran Khan's Pakistan who drew three series in the 1980s. WI were bowled out for 53 in Faislabad with Abdul Qadir taking 6/16, but bounced back to win by an innings in the next game bowling out Pakistan for 131 and 77. In the home series that followed, WI lost the first Test at Guyana by nine wickets mainly due to Imran Khan's 11 wickets and Javed Miandad's century. The next Test was a tight affair and Pakistan held on for a draw with one wicket in hand. WI squeezed home by two wickets in the final Test to square the series 1-1. WI had a disappointing World Cup, not making the semi finals for the first time. Courtney Walsh's act of sportsmanship when he refused to run out Saleem Jaffar, who had backed up too far, resulted in defeat for WI and elimination from the WC. But his terrific gesture was commended by one and all. WI thrashed England 4-0 in the 1988 series, with Marshall ripping the England batting apart at Old Trafford with a haul of 7/22. Richards's side, despite losing most of the stars, dominated cricket for the next two years and he retired after another home series win against Allan Border's Australia.







Top:Terrific on one leg-Greenidge's 214 at Lord's set up a 5-0 rout
Centre:Richards' 189* at Old Trafford- the finest ODI knock ever
Right:The king and Botham- best of pals


12.The beginning of the end of domination

Richie Richardson took over the captaincy after Viv Richards and led WI to series wins against Pakistan and Australia. The series against Australia witnessed the closest win in Test history when WI pipped the Aussies by one run in Adelaide. Ambrose, with a spectacular spell of 7/1 destroyed the Australians at Perth in the next Test to win the series 2-1. The series also unearthed the genius of Brian Lara, who made a superb 277 at the SCG. He followed this effort up in the next year by scoring 375 against England at Antigua and a 501* for Warwickshire against Durham. Mark Taylor's team visited the Caribbean in 1995 to try and win the Frank Worrell trophy, which they had not won for the last 20 years. Australia won the first Test comfortably, but were thrashed in a low scoring third Test. In the final Test, the Waugh twins shared a stunning partnership to put the match beyond the West Indies. The Australians had won the series 2-1; the first time WI had lost a series for 15 years. This turned out to be the beginning of the end of the dominance of the West Indies.

13.The sharp fall

After a 2-2 series draw in England in 1995, West Indies travelled down under to try and regain the Frank Worrell trophy. They were outplayed in the first and second Tests and despite fighting back to win the third Test at the MCG, they lost the fourth to lose the series. A century by Lara and some fine bowling enabled them to gain a consolation win in the final Test.

A disappointing World Cup campaign began with defeats against India and Sri Lanka (WI refused to travel to Colombo). More humiliation followed as they were bowled out for 93 against Kenya at Pune. They managed to qualify for the quarterfinal after defeating Australia in Jaipur. Few gave them a chance against South Africa in their QF clash in Karachi. SA had won all their five group matches with ease and were the favourites to lift the trophy. What followed though was sheer brilliance. Brian Lara produced a masterpiece, scoring 111 off 94 balls which took West Indies to 264. Excellent bowling kept the Proteas down to 245 and the World Cup has witnessed a huge upset. In the semi-final in Mohali, the West Indies started superbly reducing Australia to 15/4. Michael Bevan, the man for a crisis, who had singlehandedly won an ODI in Sydney earlier in the same year against WI, combined with Stuart Law and put Australia back on track. However, the total of 207 seemed inadequate when Lara and Chanderpaul were going great guns. Lara fell to a superb off-cutter from Steve Waugh and this opened the sluice gates. Warne returned to wreak havoc in the middle order. Umpiring decisions went against the West Indies and in the panic that ensued, Richie Richardson fought a lone battle. Curtly Ambrose's run out and a mindless hoick by Courtney Walsh put an end to the campaign and Richardson resigned as captain after the exit.

Walsh took over the captaincy but there was no way he could stem the rot. WI lost 3-0 in Pakistan and he was forced to retire. Lara's start at the top began horribly as the team went down 5-0 in South Africa. In February 1999, Australia made a trip to the Caribbean under Steve Waugh. In the first Test in Trinidad, Wi were bowled out for 51 and there were numerous calls for Lara's axing. Under extreme pressure from all sides and with absolutely no support, Lara produced a string of exhilarating performances that is surely the stuff of legend. He started with a stunning 213 at Jamaica, enabling WI to recover from 34/4 and secure a 10 wicket win. In the next Test in Barbados, his glorious 153*, remembered best for his partnership with the tail, helped WI to triumph by one wicket in a thriller. He followed this up with a violent century in the fourth Test, but Autralia held on to square the series 2-2. In the not so memorable 90s, this show of individual brilliance stood out.

However, the cracks were only widening as the WI were thrashed 3-1 in England. This series marked the end of Curtly Ambrose's career and with his departure, WI had lost a fantastic match winner. His absence was felt in Australia as the spineless attack was hammered all round. Jimmy Adams resigned from captaincy soon after a 5-0 rout and Carl Hooper took over for the tour of Sri Lanka in November 2001.





Right:Don't cuss me man..Ambrose flares up against Steve Waugh and is hauled back by Richie Richardson
Left:Lara's finest moment- the surreal 153* to snatch a win in Barbados, 1999


14.The prince's second coming

Brian Lara very well knew that the fortunes of his team rested squarely on his batting performances. He produced what is arguably the greatest series batting display by a batsman from a losing side. His 688 runs in just three Tests in which he ran up scores of 178, 221 and 130 were not enough to prevent a 3-0 whitewash. He had amassed more than 42% of the team runs and his superb command over the magnificent Muttiah Muralitharan was a joy to behold.

In every series that followed, WI plummeted to new depths. A 4-0 loss in England was followed by another home series defeat against England. In the final Test, Lara scored a record 400*, surpassing Matthew Hayden's 380 to restore some pride. A shock win in the ICC Champions trophy was the only bright point in an otherwise horrible phase. Amidst series defeats in South Africa and Australia, Lara played some glorious knocks. His 226 in Adelaide took him past Allan Border's Test aggregate. He made a splendid double-century in Multan, taking Danish Kaneria for 26 runs off one over.

Lara retired from all forms of cricket after a disappointing World Cup loss to England. With his retirement, WI had lost their last great batsman who was the only one capable of standing up to the world's best bowling attacks. Lara's second coming yielded 21 centuries at an average over 60 and he definitely looked good enough to carry on for two more years. His greatest regret though, will always lie in the fact that his best phase coincided with time WI cricket was in its doldrums.





Right:Lara after his superb 202 in South Africa
Left:The prince essays a scorching drive


Chris Gayle, Shivnarine Chanderpaul and Ramnaresh Sarwan have provided resistance on occasions and youngsters like Adrian Barath, Darren Bravo and Kemar Roach have shown promise. But it will take a while (I hope!) for WI cricket to emerge from these dark times and thrill one and all.

There has never been a sports team so universally loved and admired, yet feared and respected. Headley's batting exploits, the outstanding and inspiring leadership of Frank Worrell, the great performances of Walcott and Weekes, Sobers' extraordinary feats, the stunning standards set by the teams led by Lloyd and Richards, the assembly line of fast bowlers and finally the genius of Brian Lara. These memories will undoubtedly last till my dying day and will serve me in good stead when I sit down to narrate the fantastic achievements of the greats from the Caribbean islands to my children.


Ok guys..here's a small set of questions for all you WI cricket fans at the end..have fun!

1. Name the bowler who split Wally Hammond's chin in a terrifying spell in 1933.
2. What is the record run tally by a West Indian batsman in a WI-India series?
3. Who hit Nari Contractor on his head resulting in a life-threatening injury?
4. Who were the two batsmen recalled from retirement by England to face up to Michael Holding and Andy Roberts in 1976?
5. Who was the captain of New Zealand when they beat WI by one wicket in a controversial Test in 1979-80 (it was to be 15 years before WI lost another series)
6. Two batsmen were seriously injured my Malcolm Marshall on the 1984 tour of England
batsman 1 (temple) and batsman 2(shoulder). Who were the players?
7. Who scored a spectacular 154* against WI at Leeds in 1991 to enable England win a close contest?
8. What were Curtly Ambrose's figures when he bowled England out for 46 at Port of Spain in 1993-94?
9. How many sixes has Brian Lara hit in Tests?
10. WI hold the record for not losing a single Test in Barbados for 59 years (1935-1994). Who was the man of the match in the Test they lost in 1994?